My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Preservinglargecontiguousareasofopenspace,forestcanopyandwildlifehabitat; <br />Providingwildlifecorridors;and <br />Providinghousingatatimewhenhousingisinshortsupply." <br />WewilldemonstratethroughoutourresponsethattheproposedCHPUDhasnotmetthis <br />criterion. <br />Inexchangefor34homesitesforbuyerswhocanaffordthehighcostofconstructionatthissite, <br />thecitizensofEugenewillloseasegmentofthe“evergreenedge”viewshedthathaslong <br />definedthecharacterofEugene—athreatforeseenbytheauthorsoftheSouthHillsStudymore <br />thanfortyyearsago. <br />ThecitizensofEugenewillseeanincreasedrisktowindthrowandforestdegradationin <br />HendricksPark,the“crownjewel”oftheEugeneParksystem,andaparkcloseenoughto <br />downtownthatpeoplefrequentlywalkupCapitalDr.tohikeitstrails.Theywillseethe <br />characterandnaturalsettingoftheRibbonTrail(whichconnectstoHendricksPark)alteredand <br />destroyed. <br />AsEugenecontinuestogrowinfutureyears,housing—especiallyforthemiddleclass—willbe <br />important,butHendricksPark,theRibbonTrail,andtheviewshedfromdowntownEugeneand <br />LaurelHillValleywillbecriticaltothequalityoflife <br />TheApplicationclearlyfailstomeetEC9.9630,thereforefailingEC9.8320(2),and <br />shouldbedenied. <br />#### <br />EC9.9590LaurelHillPlanPolicies. <br />(1)LaurelHillValleyNeighborhoodLandUseandFutureUrbanDesign <br />(c)TheLaurelHillPlansupportstheSouthHillsStudystandards.In <br />general,alterationoflandcontoursshallbeminimizedtoretainviewsof <br />naturalfeaturesandretainasmuchoftheforestedatmosphereaspossible. <br />Asidefrompurelyaestheticconsiderations,thesehillsidesdemandcarein <br />developmentbecausethetopsoilisthinandwaterrun-offisrapid.Proposed <br />developmentsshallrespecttheaboveconsiderations.TheValleyhillside <br />policyappliestoalllandwithanaverageslope,fromtoetocrestof15 <br />percentorgreater. <br />EC9.9630SouthHillsStudyPolicies <br />(1)RidgelineParkSection-SpecificRecommendations <br />2.Developmentunderplannedunitdevelopmentprocedures... <br />TheLaurelHillPlanrequires minimumalterationsoflandcontours inordertoretainasmuch <br />astheforestatmosphereaspossible.TheCHPUDApplicationdoesnotprotectthecurrentforest <br />31 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.