My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ManyofthelargestfirtreesontheproposedCHPUDsite,someinexcessof40 <br />inchesindiameter,willbedestroyedfortheROW(rightofway)constructionor <br />homeconstruction. <br />Atotalof257treesarelocatedabove901'.Onlyfourofthesetreesareconserved. <br />Justoneofthefourisaconiferoustree-afirtree. <br />Atotalof82verylargetrees(36inchesindiameterorgreater)existontheproposed <br />site.Ofthese,19areconserved.Justoneofthese(TreeNo.41535inlot4)isonthe <br />ridgelineabove901'. <br />Aswewilldemonstrateinourdiscussionof EC9.8320(4),69%ofalltrees21inches <br />orgreaterindiametermayberemoved. <br />Theapplicationdescribes401treesconservedonsite.Thevastmajorityoftheseare <br />in"conserved"areasonprivatepropertyfardownontheeasternslopenexttothe <br />RibbonTrailorwithintheHOAConservationArea. <br />TheApplicationproposestoprotecttheleastvisibleareasfromdevelopment,while <br />concentratingdevelopmentandhomeconstructiononthevisibleridgeline.Theproposaldoes <br />not“blendwiththenaturalcharacteristicsofthesouthhillsarea,”andwillreplacethesloping <br />“evergreenedge”oftheskylinewithajaggedskylinebrokenupwithhousesasshownin(tom’s <br />photo <br />Thevideo(https://youtu.be/kXZahqM62cM)submittedbytheApplicantonSeptember15,2017, <br />ofwalkingontheRibbonTrailismisleadingandisobviouslybiasedbythevideographer—it <br />shouldnotbeconsideredinthereviewoftheapplication.Muchofthesignificant“dense” <br />screeninginthevideoisfromfernsandsaplings—groundcover—anditdoesnotrepresentthe <br />viewwhenlookinguphillattheproposeddevelopmentsite.Theletteraccompanyingthevideo <br />inaccuratelydescribeshowpeoplehikewiththeirheadsdownortotheside,andshouldnotbea <br />considerationasitispresumptuousandwithoutfact.Ourvideosubmission <br />(https://youtu.be/8AouZZqHh3Q)—takenwhilehikingsouthalongtheRibbonTrailwiththe <br />cameraheldatheadlevelandpointedupwardatthesameangleasaviewerlookingupthehill— <br />clearlyshowsthatthegroundcoverdoesnotscreentheviewtothetopofthehill. <br />ThedevelopmentwouldresultinhomesontheslopeabovetheRibbonTrail,andthesehomes <br />wouldbeclearlyvisiblefromthetrail.Thelandtotheeastoftheproposeddevelopmentsite <br />containsmanymaturetreesofsignificantheightwithslendertrunksthatallowclearviewstothe <br />topofCapitalHill.ARibbonTrailhikercanreadilyviewthetopofthehillasshowninthe <br />photobelow,takenfromtheRibbonTrail.Thedevelopmentwillresultinhomeslocated <br />partwaydowntheslope,andwouldbevisibletothehiker. <br />23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.