Page 17 of 67 of the 8/22/17 Application; site visit to Piper Page 14 of 67 of the 8/22/17 EC 9.2751 Special Development <br />Site visit and city records.Site visit and city records. <br />Standards (17) (a) (7). <br />1/19/18 Site Plan L 2.0 <br />Source <br />Two <br />Lane property. <br />Application. <br /> This project has The density of Piper Lane is approximately 7.2 units per acres. The aerial photo (also on Page 17) shows that the Piper Lane property has a "T" shaped access drive <br /> down the middle of the release any data about the projected lot costs for the project to support the claim that the project much of the northern & southern boundaries) of the project <br /> and the city owned land surrounding Applicant owns a single Neighborhood. The Applicants rent all of these either structure. THIS IS IN CLEAR VIOLATION OF EC 9.2751 Special Development <br /> Standards (17) (a) <br />building on the land for the proposed PUD and <br />fence will separate the eastern boundary (and <br />family detached home and a 3 unit apartment <br />units; however, they do not live on the site of <br />. A proposed 6 foot high <br />never been built. Further, it will be a 2-story <br />also within the boundaries of the Fairmount <br />. The Applicant will not <br />townhome-type development, which is not <br />Lot coverage is very high. This is not a <br />will benefit buyers of all income levels. <br />comparable to the proposed PUD. <br />Missing/Incomplete Information.Missing/Incomplete Information. <br />the recreational Ribbon Trail. <br />Issue <br />comparable development. <br />Inaccurate Information. <br />Inaccurate Information. <br />CAPITAL HILL PUD - INCONSISTENCIES OF APPLICATION ( August 22, 2017 Application and Supporting Materials) <br />Missing InformationMissing Information <br />Page 2 of 11 <br />(7). <br />site. <br />On Page 15, the Application discuss a PUD in the Cal Young development to preserve open space and replant trees. "We On Page 17, the Application compares an existing Piper Lane single <br /> family detached project as what could be comparable existing Piper Lane single family detached project, the site "encourage home ownership... particularly for low income On Page 22, <br /> the Application (toward the bottom) states that the project "integrates residential and recreational land to On Page 24, the Application indicates it will "respond to any neighborhoods." <br /> (Fairmount Neighbors & Laurel Hill Valley) <br />had open space in which to <br />On Page 21, the Application, in response to Policy A.20 <br />On Page 17, in comparing the proposed CHPUD to an <br />Neighborhood as a good example of clustering in a <br />applicable policies with respect to those two <br />Item <br />the greatest degree possible." <br /> and <br />preserved stands of trees <br />plan shown is incorrect. <br />to Capital Hill PUD. <br />plant new trees <br />households." <br />Page 15 of 67Page 17 of 67Page 17 of 67Page 21 of 67Page 22 of 67Page 24 of 67 <br />3/5/2018 <br />Source <br />One <br />151717212224 <br />No. <br />1011121314 <br />9 <br /> <br />