My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Page 39 of 67 of the 8/22/17 Page 22 of 67 and Page 36 of 67 of the 8/22/17 Application. <br />Schirmer to Nicholas Gioello. <br />11/27/17 letter from Carol <br />Bottom of Page 10 of 67. <br />1/19/18 Site Plan L 2.0 <br />8/22/17 Application. <br />Source <br />Two <br />Application. <br />Per the base zone or 30 . 11/27/17 letter from Carol Schirmer to N. Gioello changes lot count to The project is TOTALLY There are no connections Townhomes are attached Application <br /> proposes as "single family attached" . The Application does not trees are within the Capital Drive right-of-way. No . Page 22 indicates "trees are significant" and Page 36 indicates <br /> "The most <br />removing existing street trees. "Existing street <br />residential. There are no other uses proposed. <br />from the proposed project to the Ribbon Trail. <br />residences with individual owners. What the <br /> Page 39 says "The <br />significant vegetation on site are the existing <br />development site IS IN the Goal 5 Inventory." <br />propose adding any street trees; it proposes <br />feet pertains to the potential height of the <br />are a duplex or a triplex (apartments). <br />building, NOT the potential location. <br />34 and potential units to 34 - 38. <br />Issue <br />Inconsistent Information. <br />Inaccurate Information. Inaccurate Information. Inaccurate Information. <br />Inaccurate Information. <br />Inconsistent InformationInconsistent Information <br />street trees proposed." <br />Inaccurate Information <br />CAPITAL HILL PUD - INCONSISTENCIES OF APPLICATION ( August 22, 2017 Application and Supporting Materials) <br />Page 1 of 11 <br />trees." <br />On Page 11 of 67 of the 8/22/17 Application, in the section "Indicate general building location," the reply states "Per the On Page 12 (bottom) the Application states there are "35-37 <br /> On Page 14 (top), the Application characterizes single family On Page 14 (bottom), the Application says "The addition of On Page 14 (middle), the Application indicates that "many of <br /> <br />development provides connections to the Ribbon Trail..." <br />On Page 13 (middle) Application states that project is <br />On Page 6 the Application states: "Statewide Goal 5 <br />On Page 13 (middle) Application states that "the <br />the trees on site are low value..." <br />Item <br />attached as "townhomes." <br />Inventory - Not Included." <br />"primarily" residential. <br />base zone or 30 feet." <br />units." <br />Page 11 of 67Page 12 of 67Page 13 of 67Page 13 of 67Page 14 of 67Page 14 of 67Page 14 of 67 <br />3/5/2018 <br />Page 6 of 67 <br />Source <br />One <br />11121313141414 <br />6 <br />No. <br />12345678 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.