TheCommitteeremindsthereaderthatboththeFairmountNeighborsAssociationandthe <br />LaurelHillValleyAssociation,withtheoverwhelmingsupportoftheirmembers,submitted <br />stronglywordedrecommendationstodenytheproposedproject. <br />AnyonetravellingthroughtheFairmountNeighborhoodcanseethemultitudeofyardsigns <br />againsttheproposedproject.Tosubmitasfactthattheneighborhoodhasboughtintothis <br />developmentismisleadinganduntrue. <br />TypicalStreetSceneCapitalDrivewith"NOPUD"signs <br />Furthermore,whentheApplicantmetwiththeneighborhoodin2014,theoriginalsiteplanfor <br />thesubjectdevelopmentproposed18to20units.The8/22/17Applicationdoesnotaddressthe <br />gravecommunityconcern(expressedinthoseearlierneighborhoodmeetings)thattheproposed <br />developmentwouldconsistof“McMansions.” <br />Infact,theoppositeistrue.ExtremelylargehomesarebeingpromotedbytheApplication’s <br />handlingofso-calledIndividualTaxLotPreservationAreasandtheexistingsiteplan. <br />The8/22/17ApplicationonPage60of67states: <br />“It(theproposedproject’sdesign)isadirectresponsetoconcernsregarding <br />preservationofnaturalresources,vegetation,andtrees,aswellasconcernsover <br />potentialimpactstotheRibbonTrail.” <br />TheCommitteehaspreviouslydiscussedthatthedesignoftheproposedPUDemanatesfromthe <br />on-sitelandslidepotential,thelargeareasofsteepandunbuildableland,andtheexistenceof <br />existinghomesonthemostbuildableareasofthesite. <br />The8/22/17ApplicationonPage60of67states: <br />159 <br /> <br />