“Cimicifugaelata”identifiedinthesummerof2017betweentheRibbonTrailand <br />theproposedPUD. <br />Whatarethe“multitudeofopportunitiestoenhancehabitatareas”presentedbytheIndividual <br />TaxLotPreservationAreas?Theinherentinterferencewiththenaturalareasonsite(felling <br />hundredsoftrees,gradingfordrivewaysandlots,cutandfillofsoil,pavingareas,boringinto <br />rock,buildingobtrusiveresidences,noiseandvisualpollution,potentialwindthrowdamage,the <br />additionofmanymorehumansandautomobiles,etc.,etc.)willnot“enhancehabitatareas.” <br />And,onceagain,theCommitteepointsoutthat“wildlifecorridors”donotcontainsix-foot <br />fencesandemptyontopavedstreetswithtwo-waytraffic.Inthecaseoftheproposed <br />development,theso-called“wildlifecorridor”(reallyautilityeasementthatwillbeclearcutand <br />trenchedforstormwater)woulddobothofthesethings. <br />OnPage60of67,the8/22/17Applicationstates: <br />“Insummary,flexibilityforthelotcoverage,frontage,andareacriteriaisspecifically <br />requestedtoensurethesiteisdesignedasalivableandcompatibleadditiontothe <br />surroundingresidentialandrecreationaluses.” <br />TheCommitteeremindsthereaderthattheproposedflexibilityforlotcoverageisnotneeded <br />andispoorlyresearchedandcompletelyillogical.Withoutquestion,itshouldbedenied. <br />“Moreover,thisdesignwasdevelopedoveranumberofyearsinconsultationwith <br />surroundingneighborsandcitystaff.” <br />158 <br /> <br />