Therefore,theCommitteequestionswhattheexactproposalisforfencingrelativetothe <br />proposedproject.The8/27/17Applicationcontainsnomentionofalarge6footfenceovertwo <br />footballfieldslongatthesouthern,easternandnorthernpropertyedges.Thereisanimplication <br />onPage56of67oftheApplicationthatfenceheight(andthereforefencingitself)willbe <br />proposedatalaterdate,whichiscompletelycontradictorytothestatementonPage26ofthe <br />Applicationwhichindicatesaprohibitionoffencingbetweenindividuallots.Whichisit?Why <br />istheApplicationsoambiguousaboutfencing? <br />Therefore,theApplicationisincompleteandmisleadingregardingallowedfencingbothon-site <br />andalongasubstantiallengthoftheproposedproject’sperimeter. <br />THEAPPLICATIONSHOULDBEDENIED. <br />#### <br />EC9.2795SolarSetbackStandards <br />(1)Applicability.ThesestandardsapplytoallstructuresonR-1andR-2zonedlots,4000 <br />squarefeetorgreater,withaminimumnorth-southdimensionof75feet. <br />(3)ExemptionstoSolarSetbackRequirements.Abuildingisexemptfromthesolar <br />setbackstandardswhenanyofthefollowingconditionsexist: <br />(e)PUDExemption.Thelotisidentifiedasbeingexemptfromsolarsetbackprovisions <br />throughanapprovedPUDapplicationwhereoneormoreofthefollowingexists: <br />1.Thelothasbeenidentifiedasbeingexemptfromsolarlotstandards. <br />Applicationstates:“Thesubdivisionisexemptfromcomplyingwiththesolarlot <br />standards.Therefore,alllotsareexemptfrommeetingsolarsetbackrequirements.” <br />138 <br /> <br />