My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing (NRC 1)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/12/2018 10:39:26 AM
Creation date
3/12/2018 10:38:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments submitted at hearings official hearing
Document_Date
3/7/2018
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
334
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Profileandisalsoreferencedonpage3oftheApplication'sStormwaterManagementPlanand <br />DrainageStudydatedMarch3,2017andupdatedAugust22,2017(hereafterreferredtoasthe <br />SWPlan). <br />TheDesignStandardsandGuidelinesForEugeneStreets,Sidewalks,BikewaysandAccessways <br />(Fig.1,p.2)indicatescurbsaretypicallyrequiredonbothsidesofthestreets.Theapplication’s <br />SWPlan(p.3of9)attemptstojustifyaexceptionfromthisstandardwiththefollowing <br />statement:“Duetotheexistingintermittentcurb…”Thecodedoesnotidentify“existing <br />conditions”asasufficientjustificationtoreceiveanexceptionfromthePublicImprovement <br />Standards,regardingstreetsandcurbs. <br />EC9.6505(4):Sidewalksshallbelocated,designedandconstructedaccordingtothe <br />provisionsofthislandusecode,theDesignStandardsandGuidelinesforEugene <br />Streets,Sidewalks,BikewaysandAccessways,constructionanddesignstandards <br />adoptedpursuanttoChapter7ofthiscode,andotheradoptedplansandpolicies. <br />TheApplication(p.52of67)proposed: <br />"ThesectionofCapitalDr.thatisproposedforimprovementwithadditionalpavingwill <br />alsobeconstructedwitha4'sidewalkonthedevelopmentsideoftherightofway." <br />WeconcurwiththePublicWorksReferralResponsedatedNovember30,2017andrevised <br />February1,2018whichstatesthatthe"ApplicantshallrevisethePUDplanstoinclude5foot <br />sidewalksalongtheeastsideofCapitalDrive." <br />TheapplicationfailstomeetEC9.8320(10)(b)andshouldbedenied. <br />### <br />(d)EC9.6710GeologicalandGeotechnicalAnalysis. <br />(2)GeologicalandGeotechnicalAnalysisRequired.Exceptforthoseactivities <br />exemptedunderEC9.6710(3)ExemptionsfromGeologicalandGeotechnical <br />Requirements,ageologicalandgeotechnicalanalysis,preparedbyanOregon <br />licensedEngineeringGeologistoranOregonlicensedCivilEngineerwith <br />geotechnicalexperience,conformingwithstandards,proceduresandcontentas <br />definedintheStandardsforGeologicalandGeotechnicalAnalysisadoptedbythe <br />cityinthemannersetforthinEC2.019CityManager-Administrativeand <br />RulemakingAuthorityandProcedures,isrequiredforanyofthefollowing: <br />(a)Allproposedtentativeplannedunitdevelopment,sitereview,or <br />subdivisionapplicationsonpropertieswithslopesequaltoorgreaterthan <br />5%. <br />(3)ExemptionsfromGeologicandGeotechnicalAnalysisRequirements.The <br />followingactivitiesareexemptfromtherequirementsofthissection: <br />109 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.