The proposed stormwater solution for that individual lot will have to adhere to the conditions of approval and the approved <br />stormwater management plan for the PUD. It will also have to adhere to the stormwater requirements for individual lots. <br />Public works staff reviews and approves (or doesn't approve) solutions proposed during the building permit phase. <br />2 Can you direct me to the portion of the stormwater analysis that accounts for the runoff/flow from these lots? <br />[ces] dater is accounted for this run off. The lots will need to retain the runoff to exist pre-development flaws. <br />The storage container under the road is designed to handle a particular peak rate. <br />The lots in questions all flow to those roads and then to those containers. <br />The containers are only required to accommodate a 10 year storm. <br />Once a larger storm event happens the overflow is directed to either the level spreader whose destinations is the forest to <br />the east and then to the park property to the east. <br />Or to the ditch along the gravel road to the north in Hendricks Park. <br />All of this is designed so that the stormwater flowing down Capital Drive is no greater than it currently is. <br />Peak rates are designed to match existing. <br />You can also say there is less water is flowing along the road than before this designed solution. <br />See section 3.1.3, paragraph 2 for the civil engineers specific language. <br />3 Does said analysis of runoff from lots 21 - 32 apply EC 9.6793 (3) (b) as a minimum standard, since the application has <br />not demonstrated otherwise? <br />[ces] We are in a headwaters area by definition but we do not draining directly into a headwaters stream. <br />We are however; meeting flow control requirements therefore we meet this standard. <br />4. Does EC9.6794 apply since the CHPUD will result in over 100 or more offstreet parking spaces in the form of <br />driveways and designated parking? <br />[ces] No it doesn't apply. We potentially have 31 additional units as a result of the development. At 1 car per unit required <br />parking we are parking less than 100 cars. Parked cars are determined by unit count per the parking requirements in the <br />land use code. They are not determined by how large a driveway is and how many cars can fit on those driveways. <br />thx, brent <br />From: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick. R.Gioello(o.ci.eugene.or.us> <br />To: Brent Lorscheider <1orsch272865pacbell.net> <br />Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2017 4:36 Pm <br />Subject: RE: Question on stormwater plan for a Chpud <br />Brent I got this from the applicant: <br />Those are the lots at the top of the hill between the two roadways. Lots 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, <br />29, 30, 31, & 32. Those lots, upon meeting flow control and water quality requirements, will not be able <br />to release into their own level spreader because they are cut off from those open spaces and park areas <br />by the roadway improvements. Therefore they will have to release into the public and private roadways <br />(via weep hole or some other method). The existing runoff from those lots was accounted for in the <br />storm analysis. <br />Hope that answers your question, <br />Nick <br />-----Original Message----- <br />From: Brent Lorscheider [mailto:lorsch2728(cracbell.net], <br />3 <br />