My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch B
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE - Batch B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/8/2018 4:02:01 PM
Creation date
3/7/2018 10:18:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
3/6/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and anticipated heavy vehicles. The growth factors include averages of all activity that can be expected on <br />Oregon's roadways. This includes construction traffic. Practically speaking, the 5.6 heavy vehicles on daily <br />basis over 30 years has a larger impact on ESAL's than construction traffic from a specific project. The <br />existing pavement section far exceeds the require design based upon the calculated Structural Number (SN) <br />and can accommodate more vehicles (including heavy vehicles) than what is minimally required for the existing <br />neighborhood and proposed development. <br />The City designed and constructed the rehabilitation of Capital Drive to exceed our design standards. The <br />condition or design of surrounding pavements is not part of the PUD or Subdivision approval criteria. Capital <br />drive is a public roadway and the City does not specifically restrict the size and type of vehicles that may use <br />our roadways. Construction is an unpleasant but legal activity. I can confirm with certainty that construction is <br />also temporary. <br />We appreciate Mr Lorscheider's interest and inquiries to public works standards but staff has already spent a <br />significant amount of time responding to technical requests that do not have applicable approval criteria as it <br />relates to this land use application. We would be happy to provide links to standards and gather records <br />requests but we will only be responding to technical requests that address the applicable land use criteria or <br />public improvements on the site. PWE staff will provide a written referral addressing the applicable code <br />criteria once the application is complete. Mr. Lorscheider is welcome to review that referral and provide his <br />comments during the open record period. <br />Thanks, <br />Scott Gillespie, PE <br />Public Works Engineering <br />99 East Broadway, Suite 400 <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />541-682-2706 <br />From: FAVREAU Eric J <br />Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 9:36 AM <br />To: GILLESPIE Scott N <Scott.N.Gillespie@ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: FW: Road Load on Capital and Spring <br />FYI <br />From: GIOELLO Nick R <br />Sent: Monday, September 25, 2017 8:31 AM <br />To: FAVREAU Eric J <Eric. J. Favreau(5-~ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: FW: Road Load on Capital and Spring <br />Eric, more questions. Can you forward to Teri Higgins for comment ? Much appreciated. <br />Nick <br />Nicholas R. Gioello, M. Adm. <br />Associate Planner Planning Division <br />City of Eugene <br />Planning & Development <br />99 West 10th Avenue <br />Eugene Oregon 97401 <br />p 541.682.5453 <br />f 541.682.5572 <br />nick. r.gioello ci.eugene.or.us <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.