be addressed. These may be included in the JAM or alternatively may be dedicated as a Public <br />Emergency Access Easement on a standard City form. <br />As an informational item, it is noted that the access connection to the private street will need to be <br />constructed as a standard driveway apron. Also, the structural design and construction inspection <br />for the private street shall remain the developer's responsibility. Certification by a licensed <br />engineer that a structural design meeting the applicable public standards has been completed, will <br />be required at the time of the site development permit for the private street. <br />Based on these findings and future permit requirements, the proposed development complies with <br />these standards. <br />(5)(c) The provisions of the Traffic Impact Analysis Review of EC 9.8650 through 9.8680 where <br />applicable. <br />The anticipated traffic generated by the proposed development does not meet any of the <br />thresholds established in EC 9.8650 through 9.8680. As outlined in the applicant's Traffic Safety <br />and Street Connectivity Study, the anticipated peak hour trips of the proposed development will be <br />27 AM peak hour trips and 35 PM peak hour trips, which does not reach the threshold of 100 or <br />more peak hour trips. There are no documented concerns to warrant further review under these <br />standards, nor will the proposed residential development generate or receive vehicles of heavy <br />weight in routine daily operations. As outlined in the applicant's Traffic Safety and Street <br />Connectivity Study, there have been no reported crashes between January 1, 2010 and December <br />31, 2014, which is the most recent five-year period of available crash data from the Oregon <br />Department of Transportation's Crash Analysis and Reporting Unit. <br />Based on the available information, Public Works staff confirms that none of the applicable triggers <br />for Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Review are met, and therefore no TIA is required pursuant to EC <br />9.8650-9.8680. <br />(6) The PUD will not be a significant risk to public health and safety, including but not limited <br />to soil erosion, slope failure, stormwater or flood hazard, or an impediment to emergency <br />response. <br />Soil Erosion <br />Due to the size of the development, an erosion prevention permit will be required prior to any <br />ground-disturbing activities. <br />Slope Failure <br />Per the Geotechnical Investigation, the site appears to be geotechnically suitable for the proposed <br />development provided that the recommendations provided in the report are incorporated into the <br />design and construction of the project. The Geotechnical Investigation also concludes that the <br />proposed development will not adversely impact the propose site or adjacent properties. Public <br />Works staff agrees with the analysis and conclusions in the report, but recommends the condition <br />of approval below to ensure that the PUD will not create any significant risk of slope failure <br />Capital Hill PUD (PDT 17-1) Page 7 of 22 <br />