My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC COMMENTS (as of 3-1-18)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC COMMENTS (as of 3-1-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 4:03:07 PM
Creation date
3/1/2018 3:16:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
3/1/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
From: "GIOELLO Nick R" <Nick. R.Gioello(aD-ci.eugene.or.us> <br />To: fcassell ,comcast.net <br />Sent: Friday, September 22, 2017 3:11:32 PM <br />Subject: FW: Email for E.Favreau <br />See below <br />Nicholas R. Gioello, M. Adm. <br />Associate Planner i Planning Division <br />Cit of Eugene <br />Planning i Development <br />hest 1 v`" Avenue <br />Eugene Oregc i 97.4011 <br />P 541.682.v=5 3 <br />ck - lOelfc~ci.e'JQene.Or.us <br />From: FAVREAU Eric J <br />Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 11:55 AM <br />To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello cQci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: FW: Email for E.Favreau <br />Hi Nick, <br />Here is a response from Teri Higgins, who was the project manager for the Spring/Capital Drive rehabilitation <br />project last year. To sum up what she's saying, Capital Drive meets a 30 year design load of 225237 lb ESAL <br />(Equivalent Single Axle Load). Also note Teri's comment about Capital Drive having the structural capacity to <br />allow traffic counts to more than double. <br />Teri also has shown that Spring also has adequate structural capacity. Feel free to call me with any questions. <br />Thanks, <br />Eric <br />From: HIGGINS Teri L <br />Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 7:30 AM <br />To: FAVREAU Eric J <Eric. J.Favreau(a.ci.eugene.or.us> <br />Subject: FW: Email for E.Favreau <br />Sure do <br />Capital and Spring were rehabilitation projects as opposed to a reconstructed street, the difference being that <br />we strive for a 20 year design if we can get it, but we wouldn't reconstruct it if we can achieve a suitable <br />outcome otherwise. A street slated for reconstruct is designed for 30 years. <br />That being said, the existing structure of Capital was 7" to 8" of ACP on clay with the top 2 inches <br />delaminated. The Class counts conducted in 2015 only registered 5.6 Class 5, equating to a 20 year design <br />ESAL of 13,917, and a 30 year of 22;237. Based on an R value of 5, the existing structural number was <br />2.94. The required SN is 2.0 for 20 year, and 2.2 for 30 year, sb the existing ACP thickness meets a 30 year <br />design. <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.