My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC COMMENTS (as of 3-1-18)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
PUBLIC COMMENTS (as of 3-1-18)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/2/2018 4:03:07 PM
Creation date
3/1/2018 3:16:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
3/1/2018
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
To: GIOELLO Nick R <Nick.R.Gioello@ci.eugene.or.up <br />Cc: Faris Cassell <fcassell@comcast.net> <br />Subject: Road Load on Capital and Spring <br />Nick, <br />I have some follow up questions: <br />1. I found two documents that appear to cover this topic, the Administrative Order No. 58-11-11 and the Public <br />Improvement Standards Manual dated Oct 2007. Could yuou pls find out if these are the two documents that cover this <br />topic, of is it another document(s)? <br />2. 1 interpret the reading of the info below to mean that only 6 Class 5 trucks (GVWR of 8 to 20 tons) were observed <br />(registered) during 2105...That seems like an extremely low number??? <br />3. The statement "so the existing ACP thickness meet the 30 year design." factor 111 the ESAL's from the heady truck <br />loads that will be generated during construction of the PUD, loads from Class 6, 7 and 8 trucks? <br />Thx, brent <br />Capital and Spring were rehabilitation projects as opposed to a. reconstructed street, the difference being that we strive for <br />a 20 year design if we can get it, but we wouldn't reconstruct it if we can achieve a suitable outcome otherwise. A street <br />slated for reconstruct is designed for 30 years. <br />That being said, the existing structure of Capital was 7" to 8" of ACP on clay with the top 2 inches delaminated. The <br />Class counts conducted in 2015 only registered 5.6 Class 5, equating to a 20 year design ESAL of 13,917, and a 30 Year of <br />22,237. Based on an R value of 5, the existing structural number was 2.94. The required SN is 2.0 for 20 year. and 2.2 <br />for 30 year, so the existing ACP thickness meets a 30 year design. <br />The treatment for the street was a 2" to 4" cold plane pavement removal followed by 2" to 4'' of ACP. <br />With 7" to 8" of ACP, the traffic count could more than double and the street would meet the design requirements. <br />Due to the lack of as-builts a number of pavement cores were taken on Spring. The street structure was not very <br />consistent - some of the cores indicated 3"-4" of ACP on degraded PCC, and other were 5"-6" of ACP on aggregate. The <br />20 year ESAI, is 247,488. Similar to Capital, the treatment was to remove the ACP to PCC and re-pave with 4'• of <br />ACP. During constriction, the street did not indicate any "soft" areas.. so the re-paving is expected to perform well under <br />the design loadings, and is probably sufficient to handle an increase volume of traffic. <br />From: "fcassell(d)-comcast.net" <fcassell(a)comcast.net> <br />To: "lorscheider, brent" <lorsch2728@pacbell.net> <br />Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2017 10:37 PM <br />Subject: Fwd: Email from E.Favreau <br />is this of any use to you? <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.