Campus Planning Committee <br />October 27, 2017 Meeting <br />Page 3 <br />path and there would be more people nearby. This alignment seems to be better from <br />an ecological perspective as well, although proximity some cyclists might prefer an <br />alignment of the bike path closer to the river's edge. <br />• What is the duration of a typical Conditional Use Permit? <br />• <br />and the submission of the Master Site Plan to the city. In the materials submitted to the <br />make the right decision later. For example, where the land within the boundary narrows <br />internally instead of being forced to go back to the city to ask for adjustments. <br />• <br />commitment to laying back the bank despite the fact that funds are not yet in place for <br />• If no independent parking structure is allowed in Area 5, where would the users of the <br />building park? <br />• Is there access to the land north of the tracks from the west? <br />• The scenarios shown have done a "pretty good job" compromising on the size of the <br />• The architecture studio studying the academic building on the west of the Knight <br />Campus site has discovered that the existing bridge across the Millrace at Onyx is <br />constrained. The existing connection may not be wide enough to accommodate the <br />university's long term needs. This is the main connection point and must be wide <br />existing alignment may need to be corrected as well. <br />• In Area 7, what is the thinking behind the 30% coverage number and the 37-foot height <br />limit? If a lower height were later deemed more appropriate would consideration be <br />given to increasing the coverage number? <br />• <br />area? Does the City of Eugene suggest preservation of the Oak Savanna? <br />• Should the project specify a ratio of hardscape to softscape for the purposes of <br />• <br />of the tracks. <br />Action: No action was requested. The committee's comments will be considered as the planning <br />project continues. <br /> <br />