My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW (6-26-17)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW (6-26-17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2017 4:00:27 PM
Creation date
6/30/2017 3:22:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Application Completeness Review
Document_Date
6/30/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Are there ditches or a public system in the area? They must display that the <br />downstream system has capacity to handle concentrated flow. Bubbler systems <br />are no longer accepted in the City. <br />o Applicant does not include any discussion about the portion of Capital Drive on <br />the south side of the site, where lots 17 and 18 take access from. Please address. <br />Informational Items by Public Works <br />• There will likely need to be an additional inlet of some sort between the two proposed <br />intersections. Spacing between inlets is too far. <br />• Capital Drive will need to be fully reconstructed to meet City standards. Simply adding <br />additional asphalt to widen will not be accepted as Capital Drive is in poor condition and <br />likely does not meet the City's standards for AC or base thickness. That means that a full <br />21' wide street reconstruct will be necessary. <br />Completeness Review by Planning - Nicholas Gioello <br />• Two (and possibly three) lots identified as potential lots for attached single-family homes <br />appear to be located within the Fairmont Neighbors boundary (see attached Map). <br />Attached housing in the R-1 zone on the same lot is defined as either duplex or triplex. <br />Please refer to EC 9.2741 Special Use Limitations for Table 9.2740 which clearly prohibits <br />duplexes and triplexes within the City defined boundary of the Fairmount Neighbors. <br />• Page 9 of the written narrative indicates bike parking for lots 7, 18 and 34. Is this in <br />reference to the old plan set? There is no lot 34 in the new plan set. Is the reference to <br />bike parking related to the attached housing? <br />• There seems to be some confusion and discrepancy regarding several boundaries <br />referenced in the narrative. Please review the following, the first three maps were <br />generated from our GIS data, the fourth map is codified in the Eugene Code: <br />o South Hills Plan boundary; <br />o Laurel Hill Plan boundary; <br />o Fairmont Neighbors boundary. <br />o EC 9.8010 Adopted Plans Map and Legend; <br />In summary, a portion of the site is within the South Hills Study and is codified in EC 9.8010 <br />Adopted Plans (see attached South Hills Plan map and EC 9.8010 Adopted Plans Map and <br />Legend). The narrative indicates that only tax lots 100 and 201 are within the Laurel Hill <br />Plan boundardy, however the entire site, except tax lot 300, is located within the <br />boundary. Tax lots 200 and 400, which are located within the Laurel Hill Plan boundary are <br />also located within the Fairmount Neighbors neighborhood. As well, all of tax lot 300 and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.