My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW (6-26-17)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2017
>
PDT 17-1
>
APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REVIEW (6-26-17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/3/2017 4:00:27 PM
Creation date
6/30/2017 3:22:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CAPITAL HILL PUD
Document Type
Application Completeness Review
Document_Date
6/30/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
AM <br />1W Planning <br />June 26, 2017 <br />Carol Schirmer <br />Schirmer Satre Group <br />375 West 4th, Ste 201 <br />Eugene OR, 97401 <br />RE: Capital Hill PUD (PDT 17-3) <br />Atrium Building <br />99 west 10'h Avenue <br />Eugene, Oregon 97401 <br />Phone: 541-682-5453 <br />Fax: 541-682-5572 <br />www.eugene-or.gov/planning <br />On March 31, 2017 staff deemed the Capital Hill PUD application incomplete. On June 19, 2017, you <br />resubmitted application materials in response to staff comments. Staff has conducted a review of the <br />resubmitted materials. With the resubmittal you requested that "if you [staff] don't find anything <br />missing or that you have concerns about and I don't hear from you by June 26th, 2017 please deem <br />this application complete". Staff is informing you that the application is still deemed incomplete as of <br />June 26, 2017. Please see the following issues and concerns for more information: <br />Completeness Review by Public Works - Eric Favreau <br />• The narrative references that slope easements have been added to the site plans, <br />but staff cannot locate any reference for such easments on the plans. <br />• The Traffic Safety and Street Connectivity Study will need to be updated to reflect <br />the currently proposed number of lots for the PUD. <br />• The stormwater criteria was not adequately addressed as follows: <br />o Pervious asphalt is not allowed for public streets, especially in heavily sloped <br />areas. <br />o How are flood control standards being addressed for the individual lots? <br />Specifically the lots that are east of the private street and drain away from the <br />street. (Lots 5, 7-18) Where will runoff go in large events? <br />o Flood and flow control standards require consideration for ALL impervious area, <br />including future buildings, driveways, and other impervious areas. According to <br />Table 2 in the Stormwater Management Plan, they aren't including the runoff <br />from the buildings when determining peak discharge rates. What happens in a <br />large event? Will the proposed mechanical system have adequate capacity to <br />handle the runoff from the additional impervious surfaces on individual lots? <br />o The applicant has not adequately addressed the destination requirements, <br />particularly with respect to Capital Drive. As of now, it appears as though they <br />will be collecting surface runoff, concentrating it, and directing it away from their <br />property, which isn't acceptable. Where will this water go once it leaves the site? <br />City of Eugene • 99 W- l gth Ave, a Eugene, OR 97401 . 541-682-5481 • 541-682-5572 l=ax <br />www,eugene-or.gov/°planning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.