June 16, 2017 Page 5 <br />B. Potential Error in considering land partially vacant when development was included <br />in separate lot and initiated development did not proceed. (up to 74 du). <br />Tax Lot 17041333-04601: 6.94 MDR acres; 135 Hatton Ave <br />This lot shows on BLI map 5 as partially vacant MDR, and as LDR and MDR on the <br />Metro Plan. "The land targeted for the complex is at 1410 River Road, an abandoned <br />orchard that was cleared for a subdivision of town homes in 2008 that never materialized <br />during the recession." RG 10/1/12. The portion of the lot containing a house was partitioned <br />from lot 04600 and made a separate lot in 2009. PT 09-12, PF09-26. The City has not <br />identified what portion of lot 04601 it considered developed in 2012 and why. The <br />improvement RMV for tax purposes was $4,060 as of 1 /1 /12 (2012-13 tax year). This could <br />result in an error in removing a portion of 6.94 MDR acres (74 du capacity) from the <br />Eugene residential land supply. <br />C. Potential Errors in Considering Land Developed When it May Not Be (possibly 37 <br />du) <br />1) Tax lot 17041144-01900 (1.31 acres) shows on BLI map 2 as "Developed <br />Residential Lands." However, property explorer shows the lot zoned as MDR, partly single <br />family housing and partly vacant. The property has a house. The Metro Plan designation is <br />split Commercial ("COM") and MDR. Should this lot be shown as partially vacant MDR, and <br />what would be the division between developed and vacant? If 1 acre is vacant MDR, this <br />would be 11 du additional capacity. <br />2) Tax lots 17041432-08700 (1.81 acres) and 03800 (0.04 acres) show on BLI map 5 <br />as "Developed Residential Lands." However, property explorer shows the lots as Vacant and <br />zoned MDR, with no associated building permits. For tax lot 08700, the Metro Plan <br />designation is MDR and the Property Classification is Residential Potential Development <br />Vacant. For tax lot 03800, the Metro Plan shows a split designation of Gov't&Ed, MDR and <br />Parks&Open Space. Both properties had tax improvements RMV of zero. Should these lots <br />be treated as Vacant MDR? If 1 acre is vacant MDR, this would be 11 du additional capacity. <br />3) Tax lot 17041144-01900 shows on BLI map 2 as "Developed Residential Lands." It <br />has a split Metro Plan designation of MDR and Commercial, and is zoned R-2, MDR. <br />Property Explorer shows the lot as part Single Family and Part Vacant. The acreage of the <br />lot is 1.33 acres, while the house, garages, patio and driveway have a footprint of roughly <br />0.11 acres, leaving a balance of roughly 1.22 acres. Should this lot show as partially vacant <br />MDR? If 1 acre is vacant MDR, this would be 11 du additional capacity. <br />4) Tax lot 17041144-00101 shows on BLI map 2 as "Developed Residential Lands." It <br />has a Metro Plan designation of MDR, and is zoned R-2, MDR. Property Explorer shows the <br />lot as part Single Family. The acreage of the lot is 0.55 acres, while the house, garage, patio <br />and driveway has a footprint of roughly 0.14 acres, leaving a balance of roughly 0.41 acres. <br />Should this lot show as partially vacant MDR, or up to 4 du additional capacity? <br />