would also require the inclusion of all land east of the school expansion and south of Clear Lake Road, or <br />362.2 acres. Some of this land (222.1 acres) is under consideration for a park expansion, but the <br />remaining 140.1 acres taken in by this expansion, plus the 107.7 acres north of Clear Lake Road and the <br />5.3 acres on Green Hill Road (for a total of 253.1 acres up to a possible 475.2 acres depending on park <br />expansion proposals) would not meet any established need. This option is extremely inefficient. <br />Factor 2: Orderly and economic provision of public facilities and services <br />As a four-area expansion, this option would require planning of public facilities and services with four <br />different sets of conditions and timing, dramatically reducing the efficiency and orderliness of providing <br />services as development requires. <br />Factor 3: Comparative environmental, energy, economic, and social consequences <br />Environmental: The Green Hill and Awbrey Lane-focused expansion option contains some scattered Goal <br />5 protected areas and two areas constrained by the Special Hazard Flood Area. The two northern Green <br />Hill sites are also adjacent to the West Eugene Wetlands area. These environmental constraints would <br />require additional guidelines or regulation to mitigate potential consequences. Overall environmental <br />consequences from expanding into this area for industrial use would be neutral to slightly negative. <br />Energy: Portions of this expansion area would promote energy efficiencies through proximity to the <br />airport and transportation corridors, and relative proximity to various residential areas. The divided <br />nature of the expansion option would limit energy efficiency opportunities for transit. Overall energy <br />consequences from expanding onto this site for industrial use would be neutral. <br />Economic: This expansion option would create additional industrial employment land, as all expansions <br />would. Providing public services to the four areas would be comparatively costly, creating negative <br />economic consequences. The overall economic consequences of this expansion option are neutral to <br />negative. <br />Social: This expansion option would impact relatively few residents, and would not include land adjacent <br />to the proposed school expansion. A mix of additional employment sites adjacent to and near but not <br />directly adjacent to residential neighborhoods provide a positive social consequence. Expanding onto <br />Site P4.6b for industrial purposes would potentially limit the viability of the non-profit animal shelter <br />currently in operation on this site. Overall social consequences of expanding into this area for industrial <br />use would be neutral. <br />Factor 4: Compatibility of the proposed urban uses with nearby agricultural and forest <br />activities occurring on farm and forest land outside the UGB <br />The configuration of this expansion option includes direct adjacency to both farm and forest land <br />surrounding several sites. While compatibility issues with this adjacency are likely to be minimal, there is <br />a possibility of undesirable impacts. <br />Focused Expansion Option S. The fifth possible expansion option evaluated for the Goal 14 boundary <br />location factors focuses on the area south of Clear Lake Road, which contains the identified school <br />expansion and a potential expansion area for parks. It is also broadly in the area with the only potential <br />50-75 acre and 75+ acre sites that meet the needs of the industrial expansion portfolio. The expansion <br />option presented in the map "Focused Expansion Option: South of Clear Lake Road" presents one <br />Appendix B to Findings May 2017 Page 141 <br />