• City of Eugene Urban Growth Boundary Study <br />- <br />Industrial Land Evaluation <br />:,L~- <br />Subarea P4.2: Development Constraints <br />i <br />Current UGB <br />i <br />.._.._....._.._.i 4 <br />Spencer's Butte <br />a <br />oa <br />- Subarea Boundary Development Constraints <br />Current Eugene UGB Slopes in Excess of 5;£ Grace <br />' Street Rig Ns of Way Special Flood Hazard Area <br />Major Streets Goal 5 Protecled Areas <br />Eugene <br />Water Bodies ✓ Conslrarned by UseslDevelopment <br />Land for Further Consideration <br />Unconstrained Fourth Priorit <br />Land <br />y <br />Summary of Development Constraints <br />Dismissal of Land with Goal5 <br />Protections (natural resources) <br />None of the land in Subarea <br />P4.2 is constrained by Lane <br />County Goal 5 protections. <br />Dismissal of Land with Existing <br />Uses/ Development that makes <br />Industrial Redevelopment <br />Highly Unlikely in Planning <br />Period <br />Four (4) tax lots totaling 9.7 <br />acres of the land in Subarea <br />P4.2 (2 percent) have existing <br />uses or development that <br />makes it highly unlikely that, if <br />added to the UGB, the sites <br />would be redeveloped for <br />industrial uses.32 Two of these <br />tax lots are owned by the <br />Eugene Water and Electric <br />Board, one is owned by the City <br />of Eugene as a portion of Mt. <br />Baldy Park (one of an <br />interconnected series of parks <br />that make up the Ridgeline Trail <br />System with over 12 miles of <br />trails), and one is owned and <br />operated by Lane Electric Coop <br />as a substation. <br />In all, 490.9 acres of the land in Subarea P4.2 have one or more development constraints ("factors that <br />temporarily or permanently limit or prevent the use of land for economic development" per OAR 660- <br />009-005(2)). The remaining 8.5 acres of land in Subarea P4.2 are addressed below. <br />(b) Dismiss Remaining Candidate Land that Cannot Reasonably <br />Accommodate the Specific Types of Land Needs / Cannot be <br />Expected to Provide the Appropriate Site Characteristics for the <br />Proposed Use <br />32 All P4.2 sites dismissed due to existing uses would otherwise need to be dismissed due to excessive slope. <br />Appendix B to Findings May 2017 Page 71 <br />