My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Employment, Parks, Schools Ordinance (County) (all other)- Planning Commission Recommendation (3 of 4)
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2017
>
CA 17-1
>
Employment, Parks, Schools Ordinance (County) (all other)- Planning Commission Recommendation (3 of 4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:48:03 PM
Creation date
5/22/2017 2:16:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
UGB ADOPTION PACKAGE
Document Type
Misc.
Document_Date
5/22/2017
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
200
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Dismissal of sites that are more than 1 mile by road from access to a State Designated Freight Route <br />The nearest State Designated Freight Route to Subarea P3.1 is Highway 126. No land under <br />consideration in this subarea is within one mile of Highway 126.29 <br />Dismissal of land that could not accommodate one of the following sites on a contiguous area comprised <br />of one or two tax lots: <br />• an industrial site of 75 acres or larger (Eugene needs to add 2 such sites) <br />• an industrial site of between 50 and 75 acres (Eugene needs to add 3 such sites) <br />• an industrial site of between 20 and 50 acres (Eugene needs to add 2 such sites) <br />• an industrial site of between 10 and 20 acres (Eugene needs to add 4 such sites) <br />As explained above, no sites in Subarea P3.1 remain for consideration under this criterion. <br />Subarea P3.1 Summary. Based on these findings, the City has determined that none of the land in <br />Subarea P3.1 is suitable for industrial expansion. <br />(3) Third Priority Land Conclusion <br />Based on these findings, the City has determined that no third priority land in the study area is suitable <br />for industrial expansion. <br />29 Were they not discarded for distance from a Freight Route, these sites would be discarded for insufficient size to <br />meet the identified site characteristics. <br />Appendix B to Findings May 2017 Page 62 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.