2017 Remand - Public Comment (2)

CONTE - EXHIBIT A BERG-JOHANSEN Erik From: BERG-JOHANSEN Erik Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 11:30 AM To: GILLESPIE Scott N; HANEY Ed R Cc: HANSEN Alissa H; FLOCK Gabriel Subject: Oakleigh Tentative PUD - REMAND (Queing Street) Attachments: Oakleigh Remand PC Final Order.pdf Scott and Ed, The Oakleigh Tentative PUD has been remanded back to the Planning Commission for a second time. LUBA also instructed that the City open the record for new evidence related to the following issues: (1) the right-of-way width of Oakleigh Lane; (2) the pavement width of Oakleigh Lane; and (3) parking on Oakleigh Lane. There will be an "open record period" for new evidence ending on April 12, 2017 (three weeks from today). After the record closes, the Planning Commission is going to reevaluate the safety of Oakleigh Lane, and then make their decision. We expect that opponents will submit hundreds of pages of evidence saying why a 14' queing street (Oakleigh Lane) is not safe, and how it does not meet City standards. We will need PW to weigh in on this issue, and some of the key issues to evaluate are on Page 6 of the PC's initial Final Order (see attachment). There is discussion of Mike Weishar's letter, the Eimstad survey, and statements about how a 14' queing street can provide safe access. I am hoping your team can reevaluate the findings in this original Final Order and confirm that the queing street is consistent with the code. Ed, I was also wondering if you could find a few additional examples where a 14' queing street was allowed through a Land Use Decision? I will send out a meeting invite for sometime next week because I think it would be helpful to discuss before we craft the staff memo. We may also want Kathryn B. to review the memo before it is submitted into the record. Thanks in advance for your help on this! ;n• ~rvi ~i v of E ~gene erik. berg @ci. eugene. or. us