My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-I (2)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2013
>
PDT 13-1
>
LUBA RET. EX 076/077 RE-I (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 4:32:31 PM
Creation date
3/28/2017 3:49:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
13
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
OAKLEIGH COHOUSING
Document Type
LUBA Materials
Document_Date
10/9/2013
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Local Street Standards <br />Table 2 <br />` <br />Paving Width <br />Type of Street <br />R.O.W <br />No <br />Parking <br />Parking <br />(Setback) <br />Planting <br />Average Daily <br />Width <br />Parking <br />One Side <br />Two Sides <br />Sidewalks <br />Strips <br />Traffic (ADT <br />A <br />' <br />21' <br />' <br />ccess Lane <br />55 <br />28' <br />2 @ 6 <br />2 @ 6" <br />< 250 ADT <br />45' <br />20' <br />2 @ 6' <br />2 @ 6'-6" <br />Low-Volume Res. <br />45' <br />21' <br />2 @ 6' <br />2 @ 6'-0" <br />250 to 750 <br />55' <br />28' <br />2 @ 6' <br />2 @ T-6" <br />ADT <br />There are no gutters, curbs or sidewalks. Pedestrians, bicyclists and wheel-chair users <br />must share the road with cars and other motorized vehicles. Numerous residents park <br />at least one vehicle on the side of the roadway, in many cases partially blocking the <br />paved portion. <br />Based on right-of-way and paving widths, the lack of improvements, and the Lane <br />County designation of Oakleigh Lane as an "access road," and the fact that the right-of- <br />way has never been adopted by Lane County or City of Eugene, it's clear that Oakleigh <br />Lane is properly characterized as an "Access Lane," according to the specifications in <br />the ASCP Table 2 (see above excerpts). <br />TRIP GENERATION & TRAFFIC IMPACTS <br />Not counting the proposed development site, there are 23 lots that take access from <br />Oakleigh Lane. (See Attachments C, D and E.) The four lots closest to the intersection <br />with River Road are non-residential uses and generate minimal, 4f any, vehicular traffic <br />past the residences to the east on Oakleigh Lane. There are 19 single-family, detached <br />dwellings along Oakleigh Lane. <br />According to the Institute of Traffic Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 9th Edition, <br />the Average Daily Trip (ITE-ADT) rate per dwelling for single-family, detached <br />dwellings is 9.52. The estimated ITE-ADT for these 19 dwelling units is 181 (19 x 9.52). <br />The PUD proposes 29 dwelling units (SR at 20) and parking spaces for approximately 52 <br />vehicles (SR at 30). The ITE-ADT rate per dwelling for condominiums (ITE use type 230) <br />is 5.81. The rate ITE-ADT rate per vehicle is 3.34. Based on the 29 dwelling units and 52 <br />parking spaces, the estimated ITE-ADT for the PUD is in the range of 169 to 174. <br />The additional traffic from the PUD will thus approximately double (1.9 times) the ITE- <br />ADT on Oakleigh Lane. <br />Simply comparing current and projected ITE-ADT; however, is not the most <br />appropriate way to evaluate impacts of increased traffic. The full impact of a vehicle <br />trip on residents, other drivers, and pedestrians and bicyclists is directly proportional to <br />the number of residences passed and other travelers encountered on the road. A <br />relatively good approximation of the total impact of one trip is the number of residences <br />October 9, 2013 Conte testimony re PUD 13-1 5 1 P a g e <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.