Street Access Study" that's required for an exception. This letter provide no quantitative <br />data related to projected trips traffic impacts or safety. None of the discussion dealt <br />with conditions, capacity or safety for the entire length of Oakleigh Lane from the <br />development site out to the intersection with River Road. <br />In addressing how the proposal "meets the intent" of EC 9.6815(1)(a) - "Streets are <br />designed to efficiently and safely accommodate emergency fire and medical service <br />vehicles." - the letter states: <br />"Tax lot 200 can accommodate an emergency turnaround in the southwest comer of <br />a future development with an additional right-of-way dedication from Oakleigh <br />Meadows." <br />This limited evidence regarding the ability of vehicles to (at some future date) turn <br />around at the end of Oakleigh Lane does not address at all the fact that the all <br />emergency fire and medical service vehicles making emergency trips to the PUD must <br />travel the entire length of Oakleigh Lane. As discussed above, the Eugene Public Works <br />analysis found that without a wider right-of-way and improvements, "emergency <br />response and access will be at risk." . <br />Accordingly, the letter fails to meet the requirements of EC 9.6815(2)(g)1.a and the <br />exception should be denied. <br />EC 9.8320(5)(c) <br />The application states that the ITE estimate for PM Peak Hour rate is .52 cars and the <br />estimate for AM Peak Hour rate is .42 cars per dwelling unit. This equates to one car <br />every four minutes in the evening and one car every five minutes in the morning. The <br />application doesn't address the ITE estimate for Average Daily Trips (ITE-ADT), which <br />is discussed above. <br />EC 9.8320(6) <br />The application states: <br />"PUD proposes a single vehicular access off Oakleigh Lane that accommodates the <br />required driveway widths and fire apparatus access turning radii needed for all <br />emergency vehicles by providing a 'hammerhead' fire turn-around as per City of <br />Eugene Public Improvement Design Standards Manual and as approved by the Fire <br />Marshall." <br />The application does not address the adequacy of conditions on 'Oakleigh Lane for <br />emergency vehicle access, as discussed under EC 9.8320(5)(a), above. <br />October 9, 2013 Conte testimony re PUD 13-1 10 1 P a g e <br />