TAYLOR Beckv G <br />J <br />From: Paul Conte < pconte@ pica nte-soft.com > <br />Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 8:22 AM <br />To: TAYLOR Becky G <br />Subject: Oakleigh PDT testimony <br />Attachments: CityAttorneyMemoOnNeeded Housing Defi nition. pdf <br />Becky, <br />Please enter this message and attachment into the record for PDT 13-1 (Oakleigh PUD). <br />On page 12 of the application statement dated June 14, 2013, the applicant states: "This project does not <br />propose Needed Housing." <br />The PUD proposal does include multiple-family housing, which is "needed housing" according to the attached <br />letter. <br />EC 9.8310(5} requires that: <br />"If the proposal includes needed housing, as defined by State statutes, the written statement submitted with the <br />PUD application shall clearly state whether the <br />applicant is electing to use the general approval criteria in EC 9.8320 Tentative Planned Unit Development <br />Approval Criteria-General instead of the approval <br />criteria found in EC 9.8325 Tentative Planned Unit Development Approval Criteria-Needed Housing. " • <br />I didn't find a clear statement in the application that the applicant is electing to use the general approval criteria <br />in EC 9.8320. Therefore, the application should be evaluated against the approval criteria found in EC 9.8325. <br />Paul <br />Paul Conte <br />541.344.2552 <br />• <br />1094 <br />