statements made by city staff during the August 17, 2015 meeting, the deadline is Monday,. <br />October 12, 2015. <br />Would you please provide me a copy of the applicant's written request to initiate the remand <br />proceedings so that I can confiiin the deadline. <br />Thank you, <br />Bill <br />From: DAVIES Anne C [ma!Ito -Anne.C.DaviesCa)ci.eugene.or.us] <br />Sent: Monday, September 14, 2015 12:02 PM <br />To: William Kabeiseman <billkab@gsblaw.com> <br />Cc: FLOCK Gabriel <Gabriel.Flock(cDci.eueene.or.us> <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows <br />This will confirm the follow-up voice mail I left last week in which I urged you to submit any r2quest to re-open with <br />responsive evidence by today, Monday, September 14th, as today 4 days from my e-mail, the same period of time the <br />applicant had to respond to your clients' evidence. <br />Anne ' <br />From: DAVIES Anne C <br />Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 2:59 PM <br />To: 'William Kabeiseman' <br />Cc; FLOCK Gabriel <br />Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows - <br />Bill, If you and-your clients misunderstood my e-mail, then you will probably want to submit another letter as soon as <br />possible requesting that the record be re-opened and including rebuttal evidence responding only to the evidence . <br />applicant submitted on August 311% <br />Anne <br />...From:'William Kabeiseman [mailto:billkab@)asblaw.com] <br />Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2015 10:28 PM <br />To: DAVIES Anne C <br />Cc: FLOCK Gabriel <br />-Subject: RE: Oakleigh Meadows <br />Anne, <br />Thanks for the response; I note that in the summat-y that you sent me on August 21, 2015; you <br />specifically indicated that it was ,just a summary" and directed me to "watch the webcast to be <br />337 <br />457 <br />