I S <br />Eugene PJ=4i & Cq;r Iu sioh <br />August-4.:6; 2015, <br />Fvrtl eri qre,, tf ier`e is: o_evideitce=iri Ehe.teco dtl at,even, u'gggestsow'loi~g;tYie OaTclergh,L'ane. <br />pavin'gthat. lies on pivate :pYOptg.has:beext place: Nor has there been anymention: of. a <br />piesc~be easenieiit bn Oaleleigl T,aine:. Sa,, as Ddvtes-w~ll:knoziis,tl1e Planning Collirxiission e-0titct_ <br />120.t lau fWljt use this erroneous clairn by Davies, Rven.if.it were: true. This is clearly, another case <br />where-Davies is improperly attempting to use-misleading statements of the:;law and an, <br />ir>;sizti~ation Aout. 6-8 facts ori:i1i grounri t6 lt.tl ePlanWng Commis4on:against eons Jeri zg <br />file actual facts in. the'xec`oid.. <br />Tlie+only.irelevantfacttflatthe EFC cau-cgrLs e 0.is thetasubatantiaL#'bX5 _ti of Oakleigh. -ane' .s <br />outside thepublic.right-of=way --a fact:whicl the:Heu7ngs:0Mci.al eithd i.oored_ of <br />overlooked in:ihe: decisionthaCs.beiing appealed, <br />Finally,: even ifDaves` purported feet were titreanal if is :riot; as Davies has already explained <br />fo yotx, no. one cari.iritrocice. new 1 aefs into the xecozd utless the EPCre-opezis t1ze. record. ~o :all <br />parties: <br />Davies s, poox attempt:to:slip: a- false, unsubstantiated_ "face' into the oiimir&sioners' <br />deliberations pr*dices my., (and.other opponeiits~)'substantial procedmal:r ghts and will <br />ensure another remand:uriless the EPC'now se opens. the record for rebuttal by;me- andl otlier <br />parties so that you cats learn the truth. <br />Respectfi-llysizbiziitted, <br />B,r~ `Thorns. <br />135 Oakle gh Lane <br />hugette_OR, 0404 <br />} <br />6 <br />-0 <br />I "I <br />• <br />