• <br />Qflj`ectionto.;S.u m ssionof`NO Ev'derice. <br />Redy:est to Re-Open the Record. <br />PDT ~3=7; :Oahlegh.lC%Teac~ows:'P~JD:AppeaL <br />Angu$t 1:5; 2b15: <br />~ttgeiie Pl~nriirig:Cormriussroii_ <br />c/Q Arine D.aviesr.City AttoineyCity of Eugene <br />99 West 10th A`;renue;. <br />1ugene,..OR. 9701 <br />Re; .City. File NQ. PDTIA <br />T;. Q.aldeigl-i. PUD <br />E <br />Dear, Commissioners-, <br />This letter. sexves as:m. forma .objecti'ozt to the subrnission of riew :ey danee:by Pinne._Davies; ,tlie <br />E-apne:City AttoY7iey;. <br />• I herebyrecjuest tYiat"the.Plarming ComuiissioziTe-opi the record tq allow.ine to submit <br />additioiial evidence, and.argumont:uzrebuttal to the-new evidence submitted by Davies.. <br />Tn herAtrgust 12; 2015 memo to you rega ding:the: renmand: dyoux initial decision approving- <br />%e" Qakleig~ Ml adgws `Co=hoax rg PUD.; Davies skiowz axe a <br />d slotu dung level of unellr cal <br />behauiori ihex atteumpt°to manipulate the decision ot.temand byflouting the Legal rules <br />gover= g this appeal and pro -ictiilg`yoit deinonstrablyunttue iiiformatian:: <br />=Despite:the:fact that.Davies. erselfhad pxe.vioiisly provided you"a.:siaated and incomplete <br />interpretation of the law in an attempt-to exclude purported `-'new evidence'.'' in the testimony <br />by-Simon-..Trautman; DavieAerself proceeded to-egregiousLy, violate the local code and, statutes <br />tiysfiahng, as if it were fkcE:= <br />"Second; any, of`tho.,paved p:oxt bn of Oakleigl~ Lane; that lies outside the right of way <br />that has existed fox. 10 years: of more will be considered to have been acqui ,ed.by the <br />City as. apfek#ptive.easement..'° (Emphasis added,) <br />First off; it.is= absolutely not.true that, as..2_tnatta of 1477 any of the paved portion of 0akleigh <br />Lane: that lies outside the _right. of way that.l as existed..for 1Q <br />:ears or iioxe is certain to lie <br />'considered to have been acquired by the. City as a prescriptive easement: Chedr.with any <br />independent and competent attorney,: sixcli as F.ti=ii'ly Jetome,, to ascertar<i:tl at.Davies-grossly <br />mji §represented the.law in this regard. While it"is:p.ossible that the City 711i& suea ssfully <br />acquire a-prescriptive easement,.it-is:by"noZaeans an: established fact that -commissioners should <br />be misled. to rely upon; either. form. ally in your. decisionor informally in fom*,g. your personal <br />opiiuons, <br />Page 1. of 2 <br />I. <br />5 <br />125 <br />