I <br />2 <br />Area Summary <br />Area <br />Land Type <br />Action <br />1 <br />Mostly High Value Farm Land with some <br />Included Both Exception <br />Exception Land <br />Land and High Value <br />Farm Land, for <br />Residential Land Need - <br />Omitted most High <br />Value Farm Land <br />5 <br />Predominantly Exception Land <br />Included Mid Area 5, All <br />High Value Farm Land, <br />for Residential Land <br />Land Need. North and <br />South Area 5, mostly <br />Exception Lands, were <br />not Included <br />6 <br />High Value Farm Land <br />Included the lower part <br />of Area 6, all High <br />Value Farm Land <br />7 <br />Worst Quality Farm Land (East of I-5) <br />Not Included <br />8 <br />Better Quality Farm Land (East of I-5) <br />Included for <br />Employment Land <br />3 FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />4 A. TSP Violates Goal 9 <br />5 As already noted, the proposed east-west bypass would travel through <br />6 Areas 5 and 6 and through the Coburg NIA to connect with Coburg Industrial <br />7 Way, a north/south collector. Petitioners argue that the county erred in <br />8 adopting a TSP that does not comply with the Statewide Planning Goal 9 <br />Page 6 <br />