Criterion <br />Analysis <br />Lot has improvements with a value of less <br />This criterion may be used only if based <br />than $20,000. <br />on findings and an adequate factual base <br />that the lands are not likely to be <br />redeveloped during the 20-year planning <br />period. The valuation threshold used by <br />the city is very low in relation to the <br />potential value of residential <br />redevelopment, and would appear to <br />effectively define lands that have minimal <br />improvements as being developed rather <br />than vacant. <br />Lot has 1 dwelling and is larger than three <br />This criterion may be used only if based <br />acres. <br />on findings and an adequate factual base <br />that the lands are not likely to be <br />redeveloped duritlg the 20-year planning <br />period. The acreage threshold used by the <br />city is very high. A lot lvlth an existing <br />home and several acres of land normal I), <br />could accommodate some additional <br />residential development during a twenty- <br />year planning period. As noted in the <br />section of this report addressing housing <br />need, the city has not analyzed the actual <br />level of redevelopment that has occurred <br />on such lands, making it impossible to <br />reach definitive conclusions about the <br />amount of redevelopment that is likely to <br />occur, as those terms are used in OAR <br />660-008-0005(2) and 660-021-0010(1) <br />and 0060(1)(e) and (5). The city appears <br />to have exellyded a substantial amount of <br />exception lands based on this criterion. <br />Bend UGB Order 001775 121 of 156 January 8, 2010 <br />