Criterion <br />Analysis <br />Lot is not a public or private open space. <br />This criterion is a permissible suitability <br />screen for publicb, owne(l open space, but <br />not for private open space. OAR 660-008- <br />0005(2), <br />Lot is developed with a scliool of church <br />(1) Some Church and school land may be <br />and is larger than 5 acres, <br />redeveloped. Such lands may be screened <br />as ` Llllsultable" Only based on findings <br />and an adequate factual base that they are <br />not likely to be redeveloped during the 20- <br />year planning periodLarger lots with <br />substantial vacant land generally will be <br />considered to be suitable (at least in part).. <br />Lot is not a landfill. <br />This criterion may be used only if based <br />oil findings and an adequate faCtllal base <br />that the lands are not likely to be <br />redeveloped during the 20-year planning <br />period. OAR 660-008-0005(2) (for <br />housing) and OAR 660-009-0005(2) (for <br />employment). <br />Lot is not a destination resort approved by <br />This criterion may be used only if based <br />the county. <br />on findings and an adequate factual base <br />that the lands are not likely to be <br />redeveloped during the 20-year planning <br />period. <br />Lot has recorded CC&Rs prohibiting <br />This criterion may be used only if based <br />further division. <br />on findings and an adequate factual base <br />that the lands are not likely to be <br />redeveloped during the 20-year planning <br />period. The director finds that the <br />evidence citied in the city's findings, R. at <br />1171-1174, does not support the city's <br />conclusion that the listed subdivisions <br />cannot be redeveloped. The comments in <br />Table V-6 [R. at 1173] show that <br />additional residential development is not <br />prohibited in almost all of the <br />subdivisions listed. Even for those few <br />subdivisions where additional land <br />divisions are prohibited by CC&Rs, the <br />findings do not address whether there are <br />vacant lots, or whether additional housing <br />not involving a land division, such as an <br />"in-law" apartment or "granny flat" may <br />be feasible. <br />Bend UGB Order 001775 120 of 156 January 8, 2010 <br />