December 3-4, 2015 - LCDC Salem <br />Agenda Item 4, Attachment H <br />660-038-0130(b) - Flood Plain capacity for emplovment use. This should be treated <br />the same way as tsunami zone land. Where cities allow employment uses inside flood <br />plain, that capacity should be counted. <br />(b) For other lands within Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) as identified on the <br />applicable Floodlnsurance Rate Map (FIRM), p yd -44wio reduction <br />unless the citv's existing zoning classification ofsuch areas prohibits or reduces allowed <br />development, in which case, the reduction shall be based upon the maximum density <br />alloiced by the city's existin.c, zoning classification. <br />660-038-0080 & 660-038-0150 - Redesianation. These changes are necessary to make <br />the rule consistent with Goal 14's requirement that "Prior to expanding an urban growth <br />boundary, local governments shall demonstrate that needs cannot reasonably be <br />accommodated on land already inside the urban growth boundary." Cities must look <br />seriously at redesignating surplus land - the rule can't waive this requirement. <br />The challenge with any redesignation analysis is the determination of what is "suitable" <br />for the new use. We have considered different options for defining this term, and in the <br />end, decided it would be better to leave the term undefined than to try to define and get it <br />wrong. The commission could also do supplemental rulernaking on this later. <br />Residential portion. 660-038-0080: <br />,(2) If the amount of buildable residential land in each categuory is equal to or (Lreater Formatted: Font: Italic <br />than the amount of land needed in each cate,'ory, no UGB expansion for residential land <br />need is necessary. <br />(3) Lthe amount of buildable residential land in anv categuory is less than the amount of <br />land needed in that category, a city must first attempt to meet the need as follows: <br />(a) RedesiQnation ofsurplus low density residential land that is suitable to meet Formatted: Font: italic <br />a need for medium or high density residential land. <br />(b) RedesiQnation ofsurplus medium density residential land that is suitable to Forr„a~ted: Font: italic <br />meet the need for high density residential land. <br />(c) RedesiQnation ofsurplus emplovment land as determined in OAR 660-038- Formatted: Font: italic <br />0150 that is suitable to meet low, medium or hiuh density residential needs Formatted: Font: italic <br />except for emplovment lands that are prohibited from redesignation as Formatted: Font: italic <br />provided by OAR 660-038-0150(4). <br />(d) RedesiQnation ofanv publicly-owned lands that have been declared surplus Formatted: Indent. Left: 0.67° <br />by the public entity, that have not been included in the residential or <br />emplovment land inventories, and that are suitable to meet low, medium, or <br />hiLi density residential needs. <br />