My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
PUBLIC COMMENT - DAN TERRELL & BILL KLOOS ON BEHALF OF HBA (1-4-17)
>
OnTrack
>
CA
>
2017
>
CA 17-1
>
PUBLIC COMMENT - DAN TERRELL & BILL KLOOS ON BEHALF OF HBA (1-4-17)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/24/2017 1:48:08 PM
Creation date
2/7/2017 10:47:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
CA
File Year
17
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
UGB ADOPTION PACKAGE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
1/4/2017
External View
Yes
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
331
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
December 3-4, 2015 - LCDC Salem <br />Agenda Item 4, Attachment H <br />1 (A) The likely amount of development that could occur on the land within the planning <br />2 period; <br />3 (B) The likely cost of facilities and services; and, <br />4 (C) Any substantial evidence collected by or presented to the city regarding how <br />5 similarly situated land in the region has, or has not, developed over time. <br />6 (d) As used in this section, "impediments to service provision" may include but are not <br />7 limited to: <br />8 (A) Major rivers or other water bodies that would require new bridge crossings to serve <br />9 planned urban development; <br />10 (B) Topographic features such as canyons or ridges with slopes exceeding 40 per cent <br />11 and vertical relief of greater than 80 feet; <br />12 (C) Freeways, rail lines, or other restricted access corridors that would require new grade <br />13 separated crossings to serve planned urban development; <br />14 (D) Significant scenic, natural, cultural or recreational resources on an acknowledged plan <br />15 inventory and subject protection measures under the plan or implementing regulations that <br />16 would prohibit or substantially impede the placement or construction of necessary public <br />17 facilities and services. <br />18 (6) When a city that has a population of 10,000 or more evaluates or amends its urban growth <br />19 boundary using a method described in this division, the city must notify districts and counties <br />20 that have territory within the study area as required by ORS 197A.315 and meet other applicable <br />21 requirements in that statute. <br />22 OAR 660-038-0170 <br />23 Evaluation of Land in the Study Area for Inclusion in the UGB; Priorities <br />24 (1) When considering a UGB amendment, a city outside of Metro must decide which land to add <br />25 to the UGB by evaluating all land in the study area determined under OAR 660-038-0160, as <br />26 follows: <br />27 (a) Beginning with the highest priority category of land described in section (2), the city must <br />28 apply section (5) of this rule to determine which land in that priority category is suitable to <br />29 satisfy the need deficiency determined under OAR 660-038-0080 and OAR 660-038-0150 <br />30 and select as much of the land as necessary to satisfy the need. <br />31 (b) If the amount of suitable land in the first priority category is not adequate to satisfy the <br />32 identified need deficiency, a city must apply section (5) to determine which land in the next <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.