Application Completeness Review - Laserfiche WebLink

Comments: Hazardous Materials Review Yes.. No ❑ ® 25. Is a Hazardous Materials Review application required? Comments: Street and Public Access Way Requirements ,Submitted. Missing :'Incomplete N/A 26. Identify the number of peak hour trips based on the likely development that will occur on all lots resulting from the land division. If the ® ❑ ❑ ❑ development will generate 100 or more trips during any peak hour, a Traffic Impact Analysis Review is required in accordance with 9.8650 - 9.8680. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 27. Show street names for all existing and proposed streets (public and private) and identify the street classification. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 28. Indicate potential slope easements. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 29. Delineate any street segments where grade exceeds 15% percent, where driveways are prohibited. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 30. Provide a street center profile using ground elevations of proposed streets at or exceeding 15% grade. 31. Show location and widths (right-of-way and paving width) of all existing ® ❑ ❑ ❑ and proposed streets, intersections, and bike and pedestrian access ways, both within the plat and adjacent to the lat. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 32. Show existing and proposed curbs and sidewalks on site and adjacent to property involved. ❑ ® ❑ ❑ 33. Address EC 9.6815 Street Connectivity and provide supporting narrative j or if requesting an exception, provide ustifications. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 34. Show that the proposal is consistent with Eugene Code Section 9.6780, Vision Clearance Area. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 35. Indicate radii of all street curves on the plans. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 36. Show location and type of existing and proposed transit-related facilities. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 37. Show existing and proposed special setbacks, in accordance with Eugene Code Section 9.6750. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 38. Submit an Alternative Traffic Safety Study (ATSS) if an adjustment is requested to the required internal vehicle stacking at EC 9.6703(3)(a). 39. Show all existing access driveways to the property. When the property ® ❑ ❑ ❑ fronts a street under Lane County jurisdiction, show driveway locations for adjacent properties also. ® ❑ ❑ ❑ 40. Demonstrate that access to the development site is located in accordance with EC 7.420. 41. Submit an ATSS if requesting more than one access connection for a ❑ ❑ ❑ ® single development site and/or requesting that an access connection be wider than 20 feet. ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 42. Include internal pedestrian circulation plan in accordance with EC 9.6730. (er lannin review) Comments: 33 - Street Connectivity standards need to be addressed. Refer to EC 9.6815(2)(g) for qualifying exceptions to these standards. For Staff Use Only.- Referral Information . Yes No . . ® 43: Does Parks Planning require a referral. for this application? Yes, if property is one acre or:[arger.and adjacent.to a city ark 44. Is the right -of:waY under Lane County Jurisdiction? If yes, route .land El ® use referral to Lane County Transportation and Lane County Road . Maintenance Plannin g 4- Is.a referral to.PWIvI or 1'EPI required,? Yes, if there are public . improvements. 46. Does stormwater discharge to a facility within Junction City. Water Site Review Completeness Review Form Revised 9/2010 Page 3 of 4