Application Completeness Review - Laserfiche WebLink

rates, bedrock, groundwater elevations, and ground slopes. 14. Application proposes construction of public streets; provide stormwater treatment plan for public streets based on infiltration, filtration, or 1❑ ❑ ❑ ® mechanical priority and include sizing calculations that demonstrate whether treatment of runoff from adjoining lots will be on-site or in public infiltration or filtration facility in the right of way. 15. Application proposes construction of private street(s) and/or shared driveway(s); provide stormwater treatment plan for private street(s) and ❑ ❑ ❑ ® shared driveway(s) based on infiltration and filtration priority and include sizing calculations that demonstrate whether treatment of runoff from adjoining lots will be on-site or in private shared facility. 16. Application (CUP/SR/PUD) includes impervious surface area to be ❑ ❑ ® ❑ constructed with a future development permit; provide stormwater treatment plan and analysis for runoff from impervious surface area based on infiltration, filtration or payment priority. 17. If applicable, identify flow control by demonstrating how there is no ❑ ❑ ❑ ® increase in flow rates or volumes if contributing to a Headwaters Area waterway, per EC 9.6793(3)(a). ❑ ❑ ® ❑ 18. Submit three copies of stormwater analysis that demonstrate compliance with stormwater drainage provisions at EC 9.6790 - 9.6795. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 19. If adjustment request includes Stormwater Quality/Flow Control, an approved alternative design was submitted. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 20. If adjustment request includes Source Control, a DAR form was submitted. ❑ ❑ ❑ ® 21. The applicant has submitted approval from Lane County for proposed stormwater discharge to Lane County systems. 9 - A portion of the site is within Zone AE as designated on FIRM 41039C-1128F. Please reflect this on the plan. Comnients:.' 11, 13, 16, 18 -Please provide a plan delineating the drainage basins for each facility. The garbage container storage area proposed near the southwest corner of the site triggers the Source Control standards of EC 9.6795(2)(c), and section 3.4 of the City's Stormwater Management Manual. Geotechnical• Report Requirements Submitted Missing/" Incomplete / / Inconsistent ` Unsupported . N/A The applicant's analysis must"address EC. 9.6710 and AO 58-02-25-F. om lete Complete- Data Data 22. Level 1 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because the development includes public improvements and has site slopes between 5 and 10 percent. The report includes: required record ❑ ❑ ❑ ® data; a description of the development and property; a specific statement regarding the absence or presence of unstable soils; and concludes that the site is suitable for the proposed development without further investigation or recommendations. Level 3 is required ifspecific recommendations are necessary. 23. Level 2 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because the development includes public improvements and has site slopes equal to or greater than 10%. The report includes: all of the Level ❑ ❑ ❑ ® I information above; test pit locations consistent with the interval requirements in Exhibit A of AO 58-02-25-F; and test pit results are profiled and show soil classifications and ground water elevation. Conclusion must also be per Level 1; if not, a Level 3 is required. 24. Level 3 Geotechnical Analysis has been submitted because either of the required Level 1 or Level 2 reports identified potential stability issues that necessitate design-specific geotechnical recommendations. The report includes: all of the requirements of Levels 1 and 2 above; design recommendations for structures, ❑ ❑ ❑ ® foundations, compacted fill, cut/fill lines, earthwork, and streets; mitigation measures for seismic hazards, landslides, and constraints that cannot be removed; construction measures for baclTill, compaction, drainage, weather limitations, access across slope easements; inspection requirements during and following construction; and graphical representation of slope easements and design details for foundations and structures. Site Review Completeness Review Form Revised 9/2010 Page 2 of 4