Appeal Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

I NW Mirador Place, a cul-de-sac that ends adjacent to Tract B and provides 2 access to Tract B, via a short flagpole. The decision also approved sanitary and 3 water connections to serve Tract B. The 2006 decision removed the PD 4 overlay from the 57 residential lots, but did not remove the PD overlay from 5 Tract B. No development was proposed for Tract B. The staff report for the 6 2006 subdivision explains: 7 "It is important to note that Tract `B' contains the entire area of 8 Tax Lot 200 [Parcel 2] that is zoned PD (RS-12). The applicant 9 has chosen not to subdivide this portion of the parcel in order to 10 avoid having to apply for a Major Modification to a Detailed 11 Development Plan. The Detailed Development Plan that was 12 approved for The Regent Congregate Care Facility (DC-81-2, PD- 13 81-1), which was constructed on the parcel immediately north of 14 the PD (RS-12) portion of Tax Lot 200, also applied to that 15 portion of Tax Lot 200. Therefore, any development on this 16 portion of Tax Lot 200 would require a land use approval through 17 the Planned Development process." Record 2200. 18 The Coronado subdivision became final, and NW Mirador Place was 19 constructed as approved. 20 At some point thereafter, petitioner acquired Tract B. In 2012, petitioner 21 applied to the city for planned development approval for a two-story, 10-unit 22 apartment building, similar to the building currently proposed. The planning 23 commission denied that application. 24 In 2014, petitioner submitted the present application, with revisions to 25 address the bases for the denial of the 2012 application. Petitioner argued in its 26 application that, pursuant to ORS 197.307(4), the city cannot apply any 27 standards or conditions that are not clear and objective. See n 1. The planning 28 commission conducted a hearing and, on February 4, 2015, denied the present 29 application on three grounds: (1) inconsistency with Condition 12 of the 1981 Page 4