Appeal Materials - Laserfiche WebLink

I change from a low-density residential zone to PD (RS-12), and also obtained 2 Detailed Development Plan (DDP) approval to construct a congregate care 3 facility (a type of assisted living facility), known as The Regent Retirement 4 Residence (The Regent), on the eastern third of the parent parcel. The area of 5 the parent parcel subject to the 1981 DDP included what would later become 6 Tract B. In part to address concerns regarding conflicts between The Regent 7 facility and nearby residential development, the 1981 DDP included Condition 8 12, which limits the location of the congregate facility: 9 "The building shall be set back from Elks Drive no less than 30 10 feet, no less than 135 feet from the south property line, and no less 11 than 55 feet from the east property line. Other applicable setbacks 12 are included on the site plan." 13 The requirement that The Regent building be set back "no less than 135 feet 14 from the south property line" effectively prohibited The Regent building from 15 being constructed within the area that now consists of Tract B. 16 In 1992, the parent parcel was partitioned into three parcels: Parcel 1 17 (7.76 acres) included the existing Elks Lodge, Parcel 3 (3.12 acres) included 18 The Regent facility, and Parcel 2 (5.69 acres) included the vacant remainder of 19 the parent parcel, including what later became Tract B. The 1992 partition 20 effectively severed The Regent facility from the area that became Tract B. 21 However, the majority of the Tract B area remained subject to the 1981 DDP, 22 including Condition 12. 23 In 1998, as part of periodic review, Parcel 2 including the Tract B area 24 was included in the city's inventory of buildable lands, pursuant to Statewide 25 Planning Goal 10 (Housing). 26 In 2006, Parcel 2 of the 1992 partition was subdivided into the Coronado 27 subdivision, which created 57 lots and Tract B. The 2006 subdivision created Page 3