My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment (8)
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Public Comment (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 4:07:00 PM
Creation date
12/4/2015 1:52:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/3/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
142
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stormwater facilities are designed to meet this city standard; hence a positive finding can be <br />made." <br />The above approval criterion is specific to "stormwater runoff from the PUD," rather than <br />street and utility crossings of the onsite natural drainage courses. As addressed previously at EC <br />9.8325(7)(j), regarding the stormwater development standards at EC 9.6791 through EC 9.6797, <br />the western portion of the development site does not direct stormwater runoff from the PUD <br />to an on-site waterway, although the proposed piped system does outfall to an open drainage <br />system farther to the north. The condition of approval required to comply with EC 9.8325(7)(j) <br />that addresses flow-control ensures that the application complies this approval criterion. <br />Decision <br />For the reasons stated above, the hearings official DENIES the application for PUD for the <br />subject property. Nevertheless, in anticipation of an appeal, the hearings official has crafted <br />the following conditions of approval if the Planning Commission's review of the record <br />demonstrates to the Planning Commission that the application should be approved. However, <br />the hearings official notes that he has not recommended conditions of approval to respond to <br />EC 9.8325(5). <br />Recommended Conditions of Approval (if the Planning Commission would approve the <br />application): <br />1. The applicant shall submit a "Use Restriction" or "Codes, Covenants, and Restrictions" <br />(CC&R's) to be recorded with the final plat that stipulates that the lots of the proposed <br />subdivision shall be developed only with needed housing and uses accessory to that <br />housing. The document shall be subject to prior review and approval by the City's <br />Planning Director during the final plat review process. The document shall stipulate that <br />the use restriction is enforceable by the City of Eugene and that any amendment to, or <br />removal of, the established use restriction is subject to prior review and approval by the <br />City's Planning Director. <br />The final PUD plans shall note the following: "The 30-foot perimeter buffer shall comply <br />with EC 9.6210(7)(a)(1) through (5). The applicant may use existing vegetation to meet <br />these requirements. The applicant shall show on its landscaping plan existing <br />vegetation that it intends to reply on to comply with these requirements and proposed <br />new landscaping that it intends to add to comply with these requirements." <br />The applicant shall dedicate the right-of-way necessary to connect Senger Lane and St. <br />Clair Lane to adjoining properties. The applicant shall show the dedication on the final <br />PUD plans. <br />The final PUD plans shall note the following restrictions regarding areas with slopes that <br />meet or exceed 20 percent: "Areas identified as having 20 percent slopes shall not be <br />Hearing Official Decision (PDT 10-2, CU 11-1) 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.