Reservoir, west of the City's urban growth boundary. The western portion of the subject <br />property (west of the proposed intersection of West Amazon Drive and Canyon Drive) currently <br />sheet-drains to the westerly and middle onsite waterways. The nearest piped stormwater <br />system is within Martin Street. <br />Applicant's Proposal <br />The applicant responds to above approval criterion in its written statement as follows: <br />This proposal will comply with the city's stormwater ordinance. See the plan sheet for <br />stormwater. See Stormwater Study by Weber Engineering, Exhibit P hereto. In summary, all <br />standards in the stormwater ordinance will be met by this development, proposal. <br />The applicant's plans (Sheets L11 and L12) show the western portion of the site being served by <br />a proposed extension of the piped stormwater system from Martin Street and the eastern <br />portion of the site draining to the easterly waterway. Exhibit P of the application materials <br />include a letter dated February 17, 2012 from Doug Weber, Principal Engineer, Weber <br />Engineers & Associates, PC and a "Hydrology Study for Deerbrook PUD," dated February 27, <br />2007, also prepared by Weber Elliot Engineers, PC. The February 17, 2012 letter states: <br />I am writing this letter in support of the planned application for the Deerbrook PUD <br />under the Needed Housing standards in the zoning code. On June 30, 2008, Weber <br />Elliott Engineers, PC submitted a report titled "Hydrology Study for Deerbrook PUD" as <br />part of an earlier application for the PUD. This letter is to support compliance for the <br />stormwater criteria of the land use code. The current existing site conditions have not <br />been altered and the site hydrology remains the same as when the report was created <br />in 2008. The proposed site plan is substantially the same as previously submitted <br />therefore the report is still valid for this submittal. <br />The applicant submitted a report.with a different date than cited by the design professional. In <br />this instance, Mr. Weber refers to a study dated June 30, 2008, which was not submitted by the <br />applicant. Instead, the applicant submitted a study dated February 27, 2007. Although the <br />applicant submitted an older report, it is for the same property with a virtually identical <br />development plan. The 2007 hydrology study showed the western portion of the development <br />being served by a piped stormwater system to be extended from the existing system in Martin <br />Street. The 2007 proposal also showed an outfall to the middle waterway, from offsite <br />drainage to the south. The current proposal is nearly identical to the 2007 proposal, except the <br />outfall to the middle waterway appears to be eliminated. <br />The applicant's Exhibit KK is a letter from Mr. Weber explained that the 2007 hydrology study is <br />the most current study. <br />Western Drainage Basin <br />The western portion of the site shows a piped stormwater system extended from Martin Street <br />within the proposed streets, with an interconnecting piped system between the streets at the <br />Hearing Official Decision (PDT 10-2, CU 11-1) 29 <br />