My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Applicant Final Argument
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Applicant Final Argument
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/24/2015 4:00:58 PM
Creation date
11/23/2015 3:51:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
11/23/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Eugene Hearing Official <br />November 23, 2015 <br />Page 15 <br />a. Impacts of shifting to the partition process. <br />The City is suggesting that the applicant can take the longer, slower, more expensive way around <br />the block to get to exactly where it says the applicant can't go under the Needed Housing PUD <br />process. The process is slower because there would be three complete rounds of applications and <br />approvals needed from the City. That would be: the first partition creating three parcels; the <br />second round of partitions creating a total of nine; and the third creating the tenth. These three <br />discrete steps would take a lot longer than the process anticipated here. Each partition approval <br />involves a tentative approval and then a separate review for final platting. The PUD process <br />anticipates a tentative PUD application, which can become final in conjunction with the tentative <br />subdivision approval; final subdivision platting follows. Put differently, the PUD process <br />involves 1.5 rounds of processing (tentative PUD; final PUD/tentative subdivision; and final <br />plat), while the partition approach involves three rounds of processing. <br />Aside from the three rounds of applications rather than 1.5, there are other aspects of the <br />partition approach that slow down the entire process of preparing applications for submission. <br />Initially, five discrete applications are needed, rather than just the PUD and associated <br />subdivision. This means five separate application packages need to be assembled by the <br />applicant's professionals, including five discrete tentative and final plat maps. <br />There is also additional planning work that comes with the partition process. <br />For example, each partition application must include a conceptual buildout plan for the balance <br />of the site that demonstrates how lots larger than 13,500 sq ft could be further divided down to <br />lots that comply with the size limitations in the code. This approval standard is in EC 9.8220(6): <br />On R-1 zoned property, if the partition results in a parcel greater than 13,500 <br />square feet in size based on EC 9.2761(5)(b), the application shall indicate the <br />location of parcel lines and other details of layout that show future division may <br />be made without violating the requirements of this land use code and without <br />interfering with the orderly extension of adjacent streets, bicycle paths, and <br />accessways. Any restriction of buildings within future street, bicycle path, and <br />accessway locations shall be made a matter of record in the tentative plan <br />approval. <br />The lot size standard requiring a conceptual buildout plan for the balance of the property at the <br />time of each partition submission appears in EC 9.2761(5)(b): <br />Exceptions to the maximum lot size shall be granted if any of the following is <br />met: * * * * The lot exceeding the maximum lot size is intended to reserve a large <br />lot for future land division with feasibility demonstrated by a conceptual buildout <br />plan. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.