B. Current site review process allows for the establishment of site-specific <br />criteria for a given parcel. Proposed text would simplify site review <br />evaluation by standardizing criteria for all site review applications, <br />including those sites previously rezoned with individualized criteria. Do <br />the benefits of a simplified system outweigh the benefits of having <br />"tailored" criteria? <br />C. Should.site reviews limit the range of modifications which can be made to <br />the development standards, as the existing code currently does, or should a <br />broader list of standards be eligible for modification? <br />Items Enclosed: <br />Index Item #197: Letter from Thomas Hannah, Arcadia Neighbors, urging use of "a set <br />of guidelines where connectivity may be required, and a set of parameters defining <br />circumstances where connectivity is inadvisable." Letter contains a list of 6 proposed <br />exceptions to the connectivity rule. <br />Index Item #198: Letter from Gail "Jake" Bradshaw, Co-chair Laurel Hill Valley <br />Citizens, indicating concerns about the potential misuse of the ability to request a <br />continuance of a public hearing on a land use application. Suggests changing EC <br />% 9.5070(L) to state that the Hearings Official "may" grant a continuance request instead of <br />"shall" grant the request. The Hearings Official could determine whether there was a <br />basis for granting the continuance or whether it was being used inappropriately to <br />actually modify the application. Letter also raises concern about EC 9.5025 Limitations <br />on Refiling of Denied Applications being changed from the need to "overcome" the <br />reasons for denial if trying to submit within a year, to the use of the word "address" the <br />reasons for denial. <br />9.6000s Application Requirements and Criteria for Planned Unit Developments and <br />Site Reviews <br />Summary of Public Testimony Regarding Selected Sections of 9.6000s Application <br />Requirements and Criteria <br />For More Information: Contact Teresa Bishow, Land Use Code Update Project Manager, at <br />(541) 682-5452. <br />E-mail: teresa.a.bishow@ci.eugene.or.us <br />TB C:\User\LUCU\Ping Comm\pc05lO99.wpd <br />Land Use Code Update 1-2 <br />0000'78'70 <br />