My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Referral Comments
>
OnTrack
>
PDT
>
2015
>
PDT 15-1
>
Referral Comments
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2015 4:01:54 PM
Creation date
11/9/2015 3:42:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
PDT
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
CHAMOTEE TRAILS
Document Type
Referral Comments
Document_Date
11/9/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
EC 9.6820Cul-de-Sacs and Turnarounds <br />These standards do not apply because no new public cul-de-sacs or streets are proposed or <br />required. <br />EC 9.6830 Intersections of Streets and Alleys <br />These standards are not applicable because no new intersections are proposed or required. <br />EC 9.6835 Public Accessways <br />The applicant is requesting to adjust EC 9.6835(1) which requires accessways connecting to <br />adjacent undeveloped or publicly owned sites, citing that access to the adjacent publicly owned <br />taxlot 4500 can be accessed directly from Fox Hollow Road. Public Works staff also note that a <br />connection to this taxlot or potential accessways on adjacent sites would be in conflict with EC <br />9.8325(5) prohibiting grading on portions of the development site that meet or exceed 20% slope. <br />The standards of EC 9.6835(2) do not apply as there are no existing or potential accessways on <br />adjacent sites that dictate the dedication or construction of a public access way. <br />EC 9.6840 Reserve Strips <br />These standards do not apply because no new public streets are proposed or required and none of <br />these criteria specifically result in the need for a reserve strip. <br />EC 9.6845 Special Safety Requirements <br />These standards do not apply because no new public streets or alleys are proposed or required. <br />EC 9.6850 Street Classification Map <br />The proposal complies with this standard as discussed in EC9.6870 Street Width, which is <br />incorporated herein by reference. <br />EC 9.6855 Street Names <br />These standards to not apply because no new streets are proposed or required. <br />EC 9.6860 Street Right-of-Way Map <br />The proposal does not amend the right-of-way map. This criterion is not applicable. <br />EC 9.6870 Street Width <br />Pursuant to EC 9.6870, the right-of-way and paving widths of streets "shall conform to those widths <br />designated on the adopted Street Right-of-Way map. When a street segment right-of-way width is not <br />designated on the adopted Street Right-of-Way map, the required street width shall be the minimum <br />width shown for its type in Table 9.6870 Right-of-Way and Paving Widths", although a greater width <br />can be required based on adopted plans and policies, adopted "Design Standards and Guidelines for <br />PDT 15-01 Chamotee Trails PUD Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.