PDF Page 82 <br />(a) Streets and alleys shall intersect one another at an angle as near to a right <br />angle as is practicable considering topography of the area and previous <br />adjacent layout. <br />(b) If an intersection must occur at an angle of less than 90 degrees, it shall <br />comply with the standards in the American Association of State Highway and <br />Transportation Officials (AASHTO) publication entitled "A Policy on Geometric <br />design of Highways and Streets," then in effect, or its replacement <br />publication. <br />(2) Offsets. The minimum intersection offset shall be 100 feet on a local street, 200 <br />feet on a collector street, and 400 feet on an arterial street unless adjusted <br />through the process for adjustments to standards of EC 9.8030(12). Offsets shall <br />be measured from the center lines of the two intersecting streets. <br />Because of the sharp angle at the Spring Blvd./Frontage Road intersection, the proposed <br />development does not comply with subsection (1), which requires that streets intersect one <br />another at an angle as near to a right angle as practicable. In this case, Public Works and Lane <br />County Transportation staff indicate that the proposed alignment would need to be revised, for <br />example to swing the street north and intersect with Spring Boulevard at closer to a right angle. <br />This would likely result in additional fill impacts along the slope in this location, but necessarily, <br />in order to address this traffic safety concern. Other than the aforementioned intersection, <br />proposed street intersections are at 90 degrees or as near as practicable, and minor <br />adjustments may be necessary during the PEP] review to ensure conformance with AASHTO <br />requirements. <br />A suggested Condition of Approval could be: <br />Or <br />• Prior to Final PUD Approval, the applicant will revise the intersection of Frontage <br />Road and Spring such that the intersection is 90 degrees. <br />Prior to Final PUD approval road alignment will be reviewed by Public Works and <br />revised accordingly. <br />Given the proposed configuration of streets, the proposed development complies with the <br />offset standards at subsection (2), which in this instance is a minimum spacing of 100 feet <br />required for local streets. <br />9.6835 Public Accessways. <br />(1) The city shall require within the development site the dedication to the public and <br />improvement of accessways for pedestrian and bicyclist use to connect the <br />development site to adjacent cul-de-sacs or to an adjacent site that is <br />undeveloped, publicly owned, or developed with an accessway that connects to <br />the subject site, provided the-city makes findings to demonstrate consistency with <br />constitutional requirements. Public accessways shall conform to design standards <br />LaurelRidge Applicant Final Argument- Page 48 <br />131 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 886 <br />