PDF Page 34 <br />LaurelRidge PUD (File Number PDT 12-2, Z 12-2, SDR 12-5 and TIA 12-6 Page 2 of 2 <br />Applicant's Final Argument- Cover Letter <br />Septbmber 4 2013 <br />conducted additional research and submitted clarifying material. There; the applicant provides evidence <br />of compliance with the Metro Plan and South Hills Study, along with additional material regarding tree <br />preservation, building height, secondary access, conservation areas, street connectivity and block length. <br />In responding to the staff report, you'll next find that the applicant's Hearing Submittal provides additional <br />evidence of compliance with these referenced staff concerns as well as other staff issues presented in the <br />staff report. <br />Lastly, the Final Argument herein, using evidence in the record, summarizes the applicant's <br />demonstration of compliance, including, where appropriate, suggested conditions of approval. With this, <br />we believe that the Hearings Official can approve the four LaurelRidge applications. <br />In advance, we thank you for your consideration of our applications. <br />Sincerely, <br />%R Cchcwc M . S at-el <br />Richard M. Satre, AICP, ASLA, CSI <br />Principal, Schirmer Satre Group <br />83 <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 838 <br />