PDF Page 33 <br />.i= <br />September d; 2013 <br />Eugene f-igarings:.Of Mal <br />c/o: City pf EUgege <br />Planning: and Development De art-O'nt <br />Planning Divis oh <br />99 West 1p"'RvenuE <br />gzpe; OR 9740.4 <br />R': t_aU'MRldt p-;PUD <br />File N.t*m6e' rPRT 1:2=2- l'IA 12 G, SDf~ 12-5 a.nd_ Z 12,2 <br />rlppllGarit`s FinalArgu~en, <br />Dear Eiig6ne Headng6 Official" <br />P,ttached is the Applioant's Find Argor.6rtt; As. you review'this-niater-W we eritauraga you ta.~losely <br />#udy ther:entire appl cant pa!ckarge.. In order, all of the moterfafs su6m. - tied to. the: C(ty ara in thre& <br />ca#?o4ries' <br />1. Thaapplicant's foii'r~ipplicatian,s:ubrnltlal5 Planned taniC QeVkalepmErnt Tentative. Stage <br />(PDT 1Z.2); TTafflc.ImpactAnaIysis (TIA 1276); 8tandardF, RevibVr {S OR 12 Y5), aiid Zona <br />Dtiarige ('12 2): ihciudfng iriritton sltetnnts; ehibit$,. attachments and plan$e.t'and dated <br />;ftitp 2~F, X0:13. <br />Tneapjalicartf's:PreaHc tin ubiirittal, tHatp tic ge df mdt6dal'dated Aug_Ust28- 20t3;bi but <br />submIt;?ed on ugus 23, 2t)1 ,just aft°r [eeRiuing` the #adf re <br />-3. The -~Ippii anf s Hearing tuOmfttal, thaCpacltage of materaf dated .and submitted a( the <br />- [i~'ring: orc August 28, 2i11:~;. . <br />we acl nawl>rdge that jbia is a lot Qf hiai6 iA As tltitad at ilie :hedrirtg, you are siarttrig-ttifs revie si: task <br />without a:pusitive Staff Report, which othermite would. have been -4 great Fesourcg in ratting ail apiiioval ' <br />ducisibn Hence; W Iiavq drafted this final a'rgume'nt in'the, fashfon .a <br />,af Staff Report- If you are inclined. <br />t approved i5, e ~ rythir you Hoed is iri th Final A;rgumert;'or;;ofel'errci~d fp fhe record tlleceiri: <br />Typically, even ifthe-staff repommend.denial ofan applica{ion, th ydraft ~.ondifibris.ef ~pp~ovaI fhi, ase <br />tiro NO wants. to approve Tliat dtd not happar! hsre. 7hrfa ;wa have.lncluid, typical, recommended <br />conditions of`approval, pulled ivheta ~bssibla 666 other PUD approval in the record, if you lid ttre sC 0' <br />a ia.wet6st d; wa w661d uia'' tha.aApartun(ty td i/bfk°vrith staff to ftrna up -`an agreed sol of <br />conditlons, ~''ur.faam hs..p$tisride dofi~g tht_ittth past vyitlfh crty <br />;1 .:yuu afu ;r this niaterlai, yea t;tight pe'qih.VA1 is the applicaklons theirs vas,. ir1, part Ular t}ta P <br />applicaUpn: lts Wrriten StategnEnt i"~ the most thorough and served as a Wtlahh)g. &Ibt.foftha'.oth." t <br />k#ir e ppli tions and ttlalr rvrlt#eti staterileiits. The %Wften statdrnenis provide a autistantidl:arnauni of <br />rTmi0a.1.ln partio.olar•whet the applicant refers tows findrngs lei support-oE llie pplicatlorr 7h8se findings <br />are-extremely detallerdu Fb' r exarnpli%.:Wt Qi° Ztaff:rafers tq.the: PUD purpvoe statement and.ciies. <br />congerns rgardirig, or Instarige tree.pfeservafton O'd v~oavs,. you wall( find detail d'aVittan> e.tti f tha: <br />proposal. do'QS ibdiw:l ie~et applka64 c,tt&ia (See PUD - kitten Statemerit, pag-__ 9_ 3) t~ifi6 4 irif fiigs <br />are.prosen.. nafratlyo foimiat in t)fa written stafeti ecit; addliYrohat'eViderii cati`b'efound lh tha <br />eXtriti its attaGhniant5 a id.pEans. tri pad -Icufar, the plans 6ontpln d tail"s and spec' icatfons further <br />ddcrimeriting a4t¢ai ge iii cptppllanc v,llth applicable: ctateria acid starid'a. <br />uppCartientirig the.applica#bris, ya~i'It riect frtci the ProFlearg Srzbmitfal to be cUifa. <br />helpfuL Eaily on in #heirreview pbnesis} staff shared a.list of it]~iat coricorns that they <br />had !riith th'O litopasail. (Pte-Hei ring Submittal,. ErhMt: 0=0): ln° response, the aj3pllcant <br />i}}11~i s 3 EIitYD fAPEAitC5i1BGT3': + E,~iYIRONMENTGL4f?l:GlAtt3rS <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page'837 <br />