BERG-JOHANSEN Erik <br />From: gunnar@geoscience-or.com <br />Sent: Thursday, August 27, 2015 11:26 AM <br />To: FLOCK Gabriel; BERG-JOHANSEN Erik; Bill Blix; WOSTMANN Jan (SMTP); Stephanie <br />Midkiff <br />Subject: Oregon State Plane Coordinate System Statute <br />Gabe, Erik et al.: Here is the link to ORS 93.312 1 found on the web. It clearly states that: <br />A description of land that contains coordinates associated with the position of a point on a land <br />boundary must: <br />(a) Use the Oregon Coordinate System; <br />ORS 93.312 - Oregon Coordinate System - 2013 Oregon Revised Statutes <br />ORS 93.312 - Oregon Coordinate <br />System - 2013 Oregon R... <br />ection: 312, Year: 2013, Last Accessed: 2014- <br />Seems to me that this statute has to apply to any maps that can be used to describe the position of <br />the POS north boundary. And, according to Bill Clingman, it applies to the tax lot maps, and that is <br />why LCOG's maps, which are all based on Lane County surveys and tax lot maps, are all rotated to <br />conform to the State Plane Coordinate System. See what you think. Maybe it's initially more of a <br />legal question than a technical question and only turns into a technical question if it is established by <br />the attorney that the map describing the POS/PRO boundary must indeed be presented in the State <br />Plane Coordinate System, the same as the TL maps? <br />Gunnar Schlieder, Ph.D., CEG <br />(541) 607-5700 (ofc) <br />(541) 729-4271 (cell) <br />Laurel Ridge Record (Z 15-5) Page 757 <br />