Public Comment Submitted During First Open Record Period

Therefore, if the Applicant cannot produce a valid receipt for a registered or certified ailing to the Southeast Neighbors and cannot produce documentation of a discussion about when the meeting as to be held, the Applicant was not in compliance with C 9®7007(4). EC 9.7007(5)(a)(b)2 states: "The Applicant shall mail notice of the meeting a) at least 14 days and no more than 28 days prior to the meeting b) to any city-recognized neighborhood associations whose boundaries are within 300 feet of the subject property". In the period of time before the first Rest Haven Neighborhood/Applicant meeting, the boundary of Crest Drive Citizens Association, a city recognized neighborhood association, was across West 39th Ave from Rest Haven, i.e., within 300 feet of Rest Haven. In reviewing the notification list of mailings, I could not find a mailing to the Crest Drive Citizens Association. 'T'herefore, if the Applicant cannot produce documentation that Crest Drive Citizens Association was not notified about the Neighborhood/Applicant meeting, the Applicant was not in compliance with EC 9.707(5)(a)(b)2. The first Rest Haven Neighborhood/Applicant meeting was held on January 14, 2015. I attended that meeting. At that meeting, attendees were informed by Carol Schirmer there had been an error in the mailing of meeting notifications, so another Neighborhood/Applicant meeting would have to be held. This has been confirmed in a letter from Gabe Flock to Carol Schirmer in the public record (Application Completeness Review; document date 2-17-15). In Mr. Flock's letter, he states: "Based on email correspondence with at least one of the neighbors, you acknowledged there was an error with the mailing labels for the required neighborhood/applicant notice, and are planning to hold another meeting with proper notice. As part of a complete application, you will need to provide evidence and should also discuss compliance with requirements of EC 9.7007 in your written statement".