My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Public Comment Submitted During First Open Record Period
>
OnTrack
>
MA
>
2015
>
MA 15-1
>
Public Comment Submitted During First Open Record Period
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2015 4:10:19 PM
Creation date
10/13/2015 1:13:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PDD_Planning_Development
File Type
MA
File Year
15
File Sequence Number
1
Application Name
REST-HAVEN
Document Type
Public Comments
Document_Date
10/13/2015
External View
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Such re-designations were identified in the Envision Eugene process as one of several strategies <br />to reduce UGE expansion for low density residential purposes. These Envision Eugene <br />strategies developed out of an extensive public involvement process, including two years of <br />meetings with a 70-plus person community resource group, questionnaires, open houses, and <br />community forums." <br />It is apparent in the above statement that the Applicant is relying heavily on the Envision Eugene <br />process to indicate there has been an abundance of citizen involvement to support the Applicant's <br />application with respect to Statewide Planning Goal 1. However, in the Applicant's application <br />in I. Land Use eguest, the Applicant states: <br />"While the applicant ultimately pulled out of the Envision Eugene process, in large part because <br />of an unacceptably low vehicle trip cap the ordinance would have imposed in order to avoid the <br />detailed analysis required to demonstrate compliance with Goal 12, the property owner <br />recognizes the soundness of the Envision Eugene reasoning." <br />B1 admitting that the Applicant pulled out oft the Envision Eugene process, there is no <br />support (evidence) for citizen involvement, through Envision Eugene, in the Applicant°s <br />application fora Metro Planamendment and zone change for the Rest avers Memorial <br />Park site with respect to meeting the requirements Statewide Planning Goal 1. <br />As stated in "Ordinance with Exhibits" in the public record (document date 9/11/2015): <br />"The City of Eugene land use code implements Statewide Planning Goal 1 by requiring that <br />notice of the proposed amendment be given and public hearings be held prior to adoption. <br />Consideration of the amendment begins with a City of Eugene Planning Commission public <br />hearing on July 14, 2015. The applicant also held a neighborhood meeting which was noticed to <br />the affected neighborhood organization and property owners and residents within 300 feet of the <br />subject property, per EC 9.7007". <br />In the statement above, the City clearly considers a neighborhood meeting <br />neighborhood/Applicant Meeting) to be one of the require eats for satisfying Statewide <br />Planning Goal 1 in land use issues in the city of Eugene. EC 907007 applies to <br />Neighborhood/Applicant Meetings. <br />EC 9.7007(4) states: <br />"If the subject property is located within the boundaries of a city-recognized neighborhood <br />association, the applicant must contact the applicable neighborhood association by registered or <br />certified mail, proposing three possible dates and times for the meeting. The neighborhood <br />association should reply to the applicant within 14 days and specify on which of the proposed <br />three suggested dates the meeting should be held". <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.