Appeal Testimony re PDT 13-1 <br />August 31, 2015 <br />Eugene Planning Commission <br />c/o Gabe Flock, Planner <br />City of Eugene <br />99 West 10th Avenue, <br />Eugene, OR 97401 <br />Submitted by: Simon Trautman <br />Send notices to: 2303 C Street, Bellingham, WA 98225 <br />Re: City File No. PDT 13-1; Oakleigh PUD <br />Opposition to Hearings Official Decision <br />Dear Commissioners: <br />RECEIVED <br />CiTY OF <br />BUILDING & PIF:',J EVGG <br />RECEIVED R TO CLOSE OF RECORD AFTER PUBLIC HEARING <br />OUT PR <br />On August 17, 2015, the Planning Commission voted to re-open the record for new evidence <br />and arguments. (Attachment A provides a transcript of the relevant comments made by <br />commissioners and staff during this meeting, and is incorporated herein.) <br />The motion adopted by the Planning Commission set the following time limits: <br />New evidence allowed through close-of-business on August 31St <br />Rebuttal arguments through close-of-business September 41h <br />Final applicant rebuttal through close-of-business September 11th. <br />The motion adopted by the Planning Commission allowed only the applicant and myself and <br />our legal representatives to contribute new, written testimony. <br />The motion adopted by the Planning Commission limited the scope to right-of-way, pavement <br />widths and parking, in relation to the safety of Oakleigh Lane. <br />Notwithstanding the adopted motion, ORS 197.763(7) requires: <br />"When a local governing body, planning commission, hearings body or hearings officer <br />reopens a record to admit new evidence, arguments or testimony, any person may raise <br />new issues which relate to the new evidence, arguments, testimony or criteria for <br />decision-making which apply to the matter at issue." <br />This letter provides further testimony to supplement the testimony I submitted on July 27, 2015. <br />Trautman Appeal Testimony PDT 13-1 <br />Page 1 <br />August 31, 2015 <br />26 <br />