ER-9 <br />1 However, the city approved a temporary emergency hammerhead turnaround <br />2 _ that is located entirely on the western portion of the subject property until the <br />3 property to the north of the subject property is developed and the hammerhead <br />4 turnaround can be built. <br />5 The hearings officer held a hearing on the application and approved it <br />6 with conditions. Petitioners and others appealed the hearings officer's decision <br />7 to the planning commission, and the planning commission affirmed the <br />8 hearings officer's decision. This appeal followed. <br />9 NEIGHBORS' FIRST ASSIGNMENT OF ERROR <br />10 EC 9.8320(l 1)(a)(2009) requires the PUD to comply with density <br />11 requirements for the R 1 zone that are set out in EC Table 9.2750.4 Table <br />12 9.2750 specifies a maximum net density of 14 units per acre. EC 9.2751(1)(b) <br />13 defines "net density" to mean "the number of dwelling units per acre of land in <br />14 actual residential use and reserved for the exclusive use of the residents in the <br />15 development, such as common open space or recreation facilities." EC <br />16 9.2751(1)(c)(1) further provides that "[t]he acreage of land considered part of <br />17 the residential use shall exclude public and private streets and alleys, public <br />18 parks, and other public facilities." <br />19 In their first assignment of error, we understand Neighbors to argue that <br />20 the city's finding that the density requirement in EC Table 9.2750 is met is not <br />4 Ordinance 20521, which took effect on March 1, 2014, renumbered EC <br />9.8320 sections (10) through (16) to sections (9) through (15). Therefore, the <br />numbering scheme in the on-line version of EC 9.8320 is not the numbering <br />scheme that applied at the time the decision was rendered. For example, EC <br />9.8320(11)(x)(2009) is now numbered EC 9.8230(10)(a)(2014). The two <br />provisions are identical aside from the numbering. <br />Page 9 <br />000058 <br />