Per EC 7.410(3) the city engineer or engineer's designee may approve a request for an <br />exception to subsection (2) of this section. Staff notes the proposal for 22'. wide access <br />connections implicitly includes a request for an exception to required maximum width 20 feet <br />for the proposed access connections. Staff concludes that the addition of 2' to the minimum <br />access connection width will provide safe ingress and egress to the development site, will not <br />negatively impact the efficiency ofthe right-of-way and will not result in traffic hazards to <br />bicycle, pedestrian or vehicular traffic using the right-of-way. Based on these'findings the <br />Alternative Traffic Safety Study (ATSS) requirements of subsections EC 7.410 (3)(b) are satisfied <br />and there is no further need for an ATSS at the time of site development. Additionally, the <br />proposal complies with the standards at subsections (3)(c) and (3)(d). <br />(12) The proposed development shall have minimal off-site impacts, including such impacts <br />as traffic, noise, stormwater runoff and environmental quality. <br />The development will have minimal off-site traffic.impacts per the findings provided previously at <br />criterion (5)(c) regarding traffic generation and pursuant to the street standards beginning at EC <br />9.6805 regarding the street system. Off-site impacts of stormwater runoff is addressed as part of <br />the applicant's proposed stormwater collection, conveyance, and treatment system, as discussed <br />previously at criterion (11)(j). Based on these findings, staff concludes that the proposed PUD will <br />-comply with the applicable criterion. <br />(14) If the tentative PUD application proposes a land division, nothing in the approval of <br />the tentative application exempts future land divisions from compliance with state or <br />local surveying requirements. <br />This criterion is not applicable as the proposed development will not require a subsequent land <br />division. <br />Public Works staff recommends the following conditions of approval: <br />• Prior to final PUD approval, the applicant shall revise the final site plan to show the <br />dedication of 22.5' of right-of-way along the northerly boundary of the development <br />between the westerly boundary of the proposed development and a line that is 50' east <br />of the westerly boundary, and also to show the. dedication of 13' of right-of-way <br />extending from the aforementioned line to a line that is 117' beyond the existing the <br />existing right-of-way. Additionally, the revised site plan shall show the dedication of a <br />13' Public Accessway along the northerly boundary which extends from the end of the <br />aforementioned right-of-way to the easterly property boundary. <br />Prior to final PUD approval, the applicant shall submit for review and approval by City <br />staff and recording at Lane County Deeds and Records, a street deed and a public <br />accessway deed which reflects the right-of-way and public accessway as shown on the <br />revised final site plan. <br />PDT13-01 Oakleigh Cohousing <br />Page 20 of 22 <br />1274 <br />